Cleanest way to take a[b[c]] to a[b][c]












2












$begingroup$


As indicated in the title I'm looking for the fastest way to transform a[b[c]] into a[b][c], and the natural generalization to an arbitrary chaining of arguments. I'm sure there's got to be a convenient way that I've overlooked.



In my cases a, b, and c can be any expression with any complicated internal structure they like.






function-construction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The solution likely would use Operate.
    $endgroup$
    – QuantumDot
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    f = Curry[Replace][a_[b_[c_]] :> a[b][c]] also works, so that a[b[c]] // f gives the desired result.
    $endgroup$
    – Shredderroy
    53 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about generalizing the question to taking a[b[c[d[...]]]] to a[b][c][d]...?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    41 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork sorry I thought that was implicit
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @b3m2a1: Oh.... well I recommend you alter the question... and seem my new solution.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    33 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


As indicated in the title I'm looking for the fastest way to transform a[b[c]] into a[b][c], and the natural generalization to an arbitrary chaining of arguments. I'm sure there's got to be a convenient way that I've overlooked.



In my cases a, b, and c can be any expression with any complicated internal structure they like.






function-construction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The solution likely would use Operate.
    $endgroup$
    – QuantumDot
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    f = Curry[Replace][a_[b_[c_]] :> a[b][c]] also works, so that a[b[c]] // f gives the desired result.
    $endgroup$
    – Shredderroy
    53 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about generalizing the question to taking a[b[c[d[...]]]] to a[b][c][d]...?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    41 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork sorry I thought that was implicit
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @b3m2a1: Oh.... well I recommend you alter the question... and seem my new solution.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    33 mins ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


As indicated in the title I'm looking for the fastest way to transform a[b[c]] into a[b][c], and the natural generalization to an arbitrary chaining of arguments. I'm sure there's got to be a convenient way that I've overlooked.



In my cases a, b, and c can be any expression with any complicated internal structure they like.






function-construction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




As indicated in the title I'm looking for the fastest way to transform a[b[c]] into a[b][c], and the natural generalization to an arbitrary chaining of arguments. I'm sure there's got to be a convenient way that I've overlooked.



In my cases a, b, and c can be any expression with any complicated internal structure they like.






function-construction




function-construction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 28 mins ago









David G. Stork

24.1k22153




24.1k22153










asked 1 hour ago









b3m2a1b3m2a1

27.2k257156




27.2k257156








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The solution likely would use Operate.
    $endgroup$
    – QuantumDot
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    f = Curry[Replace][a_[b_[c_]] :> a[b][c]] also works, so that a[b[c]] // f gives the desired result.
    $endgroup$
    – Shredderroy
    53 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about generalizing the question to taking a[b[c[d[...]]]] to a[b][c][d]...?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    41 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork sorry I thought that was implicit
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @b3m2a1: Oh.... well I recommend you alter the question... and seem my new solution.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    33 mins ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The solution likely would use Operate.
    $endgroup$
    – QuantumDot
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    f = Curry[Replace][a_[b_[c_]] :> a[b][c]] also works, so that a[b[c]] // f gives the desired result.
    $endgroup$
    – Shredderroy
    53 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    How about generalizing the question to taking a[b[c[d[...]]]] to a[b][c][d]...?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    41 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork sorry I thought that was implicit
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @b3m2a1: Oh.... well I recommend you alter the question... and seem my new solution.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    33 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
The solution likely would use Operate.
$endgroup$
– QuantumDot
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The solution likely would use Operate.
$endgroup$
– QuantumDot
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
f = Curry[Replace][a_[b_[c_]] :> a[b][c]] also works, so that a[b[c]] // f gives the desired result.
$endgroup$
– Shredderroy
53 mins ago




$begingroup$
f = Curry[Replace][a_[b_[c_]] :> a[b][c]] also works, so that a[b[c]] // f gives the desired result.
$endgroup$
– Shredderroy
53 mins ago












$begingroup$
How about generalizing the question to taking a[b[c[d[...]]]] to a[b][c][d]...?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
41 mins ago






$begingroup$
How about generalizing the question to taking a[b[c[d[...]]]] to a[b][c][d]...?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
41 mins ago














$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork sorry I thought that was implicit
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
36 mins ago




$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork sorry I thought that was implicit
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
36 mins ago












$begingroup$
@b3m2a1: Oh.... well I recommend you alter the question... and seem my new solution.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
33 mins ago




$begingroup$
@b3m2a1: Oh.... well I recommend you alter the question... and seem my new solution.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
33 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &[a[b[c]]]



a[b][c]




ClearAll[deCompose]

deCompose = Nest[Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &, #, Depth[#] - 2] &;



deCompose@a[b[c]]



a[b][c]




exp = Compose[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]



a[b[c[d[e[f[g]]]]]]




deCompose @ exp



a[b][c][d][e][f][g]







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Not particularly "clean," but it works:



    Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & @ a[b[c]]


    For the full generalization:



    Nest[Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & , #, Depth[#] -2] & @
    
 a[b[c[d[e]]]]





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190047%2fcleanest-way-to-take-abc-to-abc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &[a[b[c]]]



      a[b][c]




      ClearAll[deCompose]
      
deCompose = Nest[Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &, #, Depth[#] - 2] &;
      

      
deCompose@a[b[c]]



      a[b][c]




      exp = Compose[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]



      a[b[c[d[e[f[g]]]]]]




      deCompose @ exp



      a[b][c][d][e][f][g]







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &[a[b[c]]]



        a[b][c]




        ClearAll[deCompose]
        
deCompose = Nest[Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &, #, Depth[#] - 2] &;
        

        
deCompose@a[b[c]]



        a[b][c]




        exp = Compose[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]



        a[b[c[d[e[f[g]]]]]]




        deCompose @ exp



        a[b][c][d][e][f][g]







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &[a[b[c]]]



          a[b][c]




          ClearAll[deCompose]
          
deCompose = Nest[Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &, #, Depth[#] - 2] &;
          

          
deCompose@a[b[c]]



          a[b][c]




          exp = Compose[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]



          a[b[c[d[e[f[g]]]]]]




          deCompose @ exp



          a[b][c][d][e][f][g]







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &[a[b[c]]]



          a[b][c]




          ClearAll[deCompose]
          
deCompose = Nest[Operate[#[[0]], First@#] &, #, Depth[#] - 2] &;
          

          
deCompose@a[b[c]]



          a[b][c]




          exp = Compose[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]



          a[b[c[d[e[f[g]]]]]]




          deCompose @ exp



          a[b][c][d][e][f][g]








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 29 mins ago

























          answered 37 mins ago









          kglrkglr

          180k9200413




          180k9200413























              2












              $begingroup$

              Not particularly "clean," but it works:



              Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & @ a[b[c]]


              For the full generalization:



              Nest[Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & , #, Depth[#] -2] & @
              
 a[b[c[d[e]]]]





              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Not particularly "clean," but it works:



                Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & @ a[b[c]]


                For the full generalization:



                Nest[Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & , #, Depth[#] -2] & @
                
 a[b[c[d[e]]]]





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Not particularly "clean," but it works:



                  Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & @ a[b[c]]


                  For the full generalization:



                  Nest[Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & , #, Depth[#] -2] & @
                  
 a[b[c[d[e]]]]





                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Not particularly "clean," but it works:



                  Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & @ a[b[c]]


                  For the full generalization:



                  Nest[Operate[Head[#], Level[#, 2][[2]]] & , #, Depth[#] -2] & @
                  
 a[b[c[d[e]]]]






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 29 mins ago

























                  answered 54 mins ago









                  David G. StorkDavid G. Stork

                  24.1k22153




                  24.1k22153






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190047%2fcleanest-way-to-take-abc-to-abc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75
                      Read more

                      Berlina muro

                      Image
                      La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l
                      Read more

                      Berlina aerponto

                      Image
                      Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa
                      Read more