A minimum of two personnel “are” or “is”?












4















Which is correct?



A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.



or



A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.






grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals







share|improve this question

























  • Possible duplicate of "A total of 10 babies is..." vs. "a total of 10 babies are..." vs. "Ten babies in total are..."

    – Cody Gray
    1 hour ago
















4















Which is correct?



A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.



or



A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.






grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals







share|improve this question

























  • Possible duplicate of "A total of 10 babies is..." vs. "a total of 10 babies are..." vs. "Ten babies in total are..."

    – Cody Gray
    1 hour ago














4












4








4


1






Which is correct?



A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.



or



A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.






grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals







share|improve this question
















Which is correct?



A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.



or



A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.






grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals




grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









sumelic

49.2k8116221




49.2k8116221










asked 6 hours ago









BrettABrettA

365




365













  • Possible duplicate of "A total of 10 babies is..." vs. "a total of 10 babies are..." vs. "Ten babies in total are..."

    – Cody Gray
    1 hour ago



















  • Possible duplicate of "A total of 10 babies is..." vs. "a total of 10 babies are..." vs. "Ten babies in total are..."

    – Cody Gray
    1 hour ago

















Possible duplicate of "A total of 10 babies is..." vs. "a total of 10 babies are..." vs. "Ten babies in total are..."

– Cody Gray
1 hour ago





Possible duplicate of "A total of 10 babies is..." vs. "a total of 10 babies are..." vs. "Ten babies in total are..."

– Cody Gray
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.




1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....




It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.





  1. A minimum of two personnel is required...




“A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).



Think of other ways of saying this.




what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.




The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.



Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-




At least two people are required ....







share|improve this answer































    4














    "A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.



    For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487833%2fa-minimum-of-two-personnel-are-or-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.




      1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....




      It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.





      1. A minimum of two personnel is required...




      “A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).



      Think of other ways of saying this.




      what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.




      The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.



      Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-




      At least two people are required ....







      share|improve this answer




























        6














        Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.




        1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....




        It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.





        1. A minimum of two personnel is required...




        “A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).



        Think of other ways of saying this.




        what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.




        The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.



        Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-




        At least two people are required ....







        share|improve this answer


























          6












          6








          6







          Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.




          1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....




          It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.





          1. A minimum of two personnel is required...




          “A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).



          Think of other ways of saying this.




          what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.




          The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.



          Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-




          At least two people are required ....







          share|improve this answer













          Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.




          1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....




          It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.





          1. A minimum of two personnel is required...




          “A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).



          Think of other ways of saying this.




          what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.




          The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.



          Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-




          At least two people are required ....








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          TuffyTuffy

          3,8991620




          3,8991620

























              4














              "A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.



              For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.






              share|improve this answer




























                4














                "A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.



                For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.






                share|improve this answer


























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  "A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.



                  For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.






                  share|improve this answer













                  "A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.



                  For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  Mark HubbardMark Hubbard

                  6,18021131




                  6,18021131






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487833%2fa-minimum-of-two-personnel-are-or-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75 ...
                      Read more

                      Berlina muro

                      Image
                      La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l...
                      Read more

                      Berlina aerponto

                      Image
                      Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa...
                      Read more