Can you combine War Caster, whip, and Warlock Features to Eldritch Blast enemies with reach?
$begingroup$
So, Whip is a one-handed martial weapon with reach. Reach is a feature that, among other things, lets you make opportunity attacks with that weapon out to 10 feet instead of just five.
Equipment
Reach (p. 147). This property also
determines your reach for opportunity attacks
with a reach weapon.
— PHB Errata
War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of making an opportunity attack.
Both Hexblade and the Eldritch Invocation Improved Pact Weapon have ways of letting you use a one-handed martial weapon as your spellcasting focus.
So, if you have War Caster, and you have a whip that you can use as a spellcasting focus, would that let you use Eldritch Blast on anyone who provokes an opportunity attack within 10 feet?
As far as I can tell, the real question is whether "spell using the weapon as a spellcasting focus" counts for the "with that weapon" requirement of the Reach property, but I haven't been able to find a clear answer on that.
dnd-5e feats warlock opportunity-attack reach
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, Whip is a one-handed martial weapon with reach. Reach is a feature that, among other things, lets you make opportunity attacks with that weapon out to 10 feet instead of just five.
Equipment
Reach (p. 147). This property also
determines your reach for opportunity attacks
with a reach weapon.
— PHB Errata
War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of making an opportunity attack.
Both Hexblade and the Eldritch Invocation Improved Pact Weapon have ways of letting you use a one-handed martial weapon as your spellcasting focus.
So, if you have War Caster, and you have a whip that you can use as a spellcasting focus, would that let you use Eldritch Blast on anyone who provokes an opportunity attack within 10 feet?
As far as I can tell, the real question is whether "spell using the weapon as a spellcasting focus" counts for the "with that weapon" requirement of the Reach property, but I haven't been able to find a clear answer on that.
dnd-5e feats warlock opportunity-attack reach
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch That would be the simplest such case, yes. If they're somehow doing something else that might provoke an opportunity attack when standing 10 feet away, the question is also asking abut that. Also, specifically it's about using the warcaster ability in that case with a spell that does not normally have a weapon component - not greenflame blade or booming blade.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: War Caster, a whip and a dagger, and provoking Opportunity Attacks
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BenBarden Due to the contention surrounding these answers, I might suggest that you hold off on marking mine correct quite so soon, even if I do happen to think my answer is correct. It might be a bit premature if we suss out additional relevant rules/errata that affect the answer. Just my suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Bloodcinder fair. The logic seems pretty clear to me, based on what you presented, but it's true that there could have been pertinent rulings.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, Whip is a one-handed martial weapon with reach. Reach is a feature that, among other things, lets you make opportunity attacks with that weapon out to 10 feet instead of just five.
Equipment
Reach (p. 147). This property also
determines your reach for opportunity attacks
with a reach weapon.
— PHB Errata
War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of making an opportunity attack.
Both Hexblade and the Eldritch Invocation Improved Pact Weapon have ways of letting you use a one-handed martial weapon as your spellcasting focus.
So, if you have War Caster, and you have a whip that you can use as a spellcasting focus, would that let you use Eldritch Blast on anyone who provokes an opportunity attack within 10 feet?
As far as I can tell, the real question is whether "spell using the weapon as a spellcasting focus" counts for the "with that weapon" requirement of the Reach property, but I haven't been able to find a clear answer on that.
dnd-5e feats warlock opportunity-attack reach
$endgroup$
So, Whip is a one-handed martial weapon with reach. Reach is a feature that, among other things, lets you make opportunity attacks with that weapon out to 10 feet instead of just five.
Equipment
Reach (p. 147). This property also
determines your reach for opportunity attacks
with a reach weapon.
— PHB Errata
War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of making an opportunity attack.
Both Hexblade and the Eldritch Invocation Improved Pact Weapon have ways of letting you use a one-handed martial weapon as your spellcasting focus.
So, if you have War Caster, and you have a whip that you can use as a spellcasting focus, would that let you use Eldritch Blast on anyone who provokes an opportunity attack within 10 feet?
As far as I can tell, the real question is whether "spell using the weapon as a spellcasting focus" counts for the "with that weapon" requirement of the Reach property, but I haven't been able to find a clear answer on that.
dnd-5e feats warlock opportunity-attack reach
dnd-5e feats warlock opportunity-attack reach
edited 5 hours ago
SevenSidedDie♦
208k31668945
208k31668945
asked 11 hours ago
Ben BardenBen Barden
10.3k12557
10.3k12557
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch That would be the simplest such case, yes. If they're somehow doing something else that might provoke an opportunity attack when standing 10 feet away, the question is also asking abut that. Also, specifically it's about using the warcaster ability in that case with a spell that does not normally have a weapon component - not greenflame blade or booming blade.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: War Caster, a whip and a dagger, and provoking Opportunity Attacks
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BenBarden Due to the contention surrounding these answers, I might suggest that you hold off on marking mine correct quite so soon, even if I do happen to think my answer is correct. It might be a bit premature if we suss out additional relevant rules/errata that affect the answer. Just my suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Bloodcinder fair. The logic seems pretty clear to me, based on what you presented, but it's true that there could have been pertinent rulings.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch That would be the simplest such case, yes. If they're somehow doing something else that might provoke an opportunity attack when standing 10 feet away, the question is also asking abut that. Also, specifically it's about using the warcaster ability in that case with a spell that does not normally have a weapon component - not greenflame blade or booming blade.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: War Caster, a whip and a dagger, and provoking Opportunity Attacks
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BenBarden Due to the contention surrounding these answers, I might suggest that you hold off on marking mine correct quite so soon, even if I do happen to think my answer is correct. It might be a bit premature if we suss out additional relevant rules/errata that affect the answer. Just my suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Bloodcinder fair. The logic seems pretty clear to me, based on what you presented, but it's true that there could have been pertinent rulings.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch That would be the simplest such case, yes. If they're somehow doing something else that might provoke an opportunity attack when standing 10 feet away, the question is also asking abut that. Also, specifically it's about using the warcaster ability in that case with a spell that does not normally have a weapon component - not greenflame blade or booming blade.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NautArch That would be the simplest such case, yes. If they're somehow doing something else that might provoke an opportunity attack when standing 10 feet away, the question is also asking abut that. Also, specifically it's about using the warcaster ability in that case with a spell that does not normally have a weapon component - not greenflame blade or booming blade.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: War Caster, a whip and a dagger, and provoking Opportunity Attacks
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: War Caster, a whip and a dagger, and provoking Opportunity Attacks
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@BenBarden Due to the contention surrounding these answers, I might suggest that you hold off on marking mine correct quite so soon, even if I do happen to think my answer is correct. It might be a bit premature if we suss out additional relevant rules/errata that affect the answer. Just my suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BenBarden Due to the contention surrounding these answers, I might suggest that you hold off on marking mine correct quite so soon, even if I do happen to think my answer is correct. It might be a bit premature if we suss out additional relevant rules/errata that affect the answer. Just my suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Bloodcinder fair. The logic seems pretty clear to me, based on what you presented, but it's true that there could have been pertinent rulings.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Bloodcinder fair. The logic seems pretty clear to me, based on what you presented, but it's true that there could have been pertinent rulings.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, but Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary.
When an enemy moves out of your reach, it provokes an opportunity attack from you, so when an enemy leaves the reach of your whip (by moving beyond 10 feet away from you) it provokes an opportunity attack from you (rules on Combat):
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
If you have the War Caster feat, when an enemy provokes an opportunity attack from you due to movement, you can forego the opportunity attack and instead use your reaction to cast an eligible spell such as eldritch blast (rules on War Caster):
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack.
So, yes, your intended tactic works: the enemy provokes an opportunity attack due to movement, so instead of making an opportunity attack you use your reaction to cast eldritch blast.
However, it's completely irrelevant whether the whip is your spellcasting focus or not. With War Caster, you can provide the somatic components of eldritch blast even if your hands are full of weapons. With Improved Pact Weapon, you could provide the material components of a spell using your pact weapon as your focus, but eldritch blast doesn't have material components, so Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary to be able to make this tactic work.
All you need is the War Caster feat and a whip.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, all requirements are met
Let's look at the sequence of action and of the logic here:
Enemy is at 10' away - They are currently in your active reach if you are wielding a whip because it has the Reach property which extends your reach when using it to 10' .
This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it, as well as when determining your reach for opportunity attacks with it.
Enemy moves further away - This triggers an Opportunity Attack
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
The PHB Errata also confirms this:
This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
At this point, we know that when wielding a whip you have a 10' reach and that OAs are triggered when a creature leaves your reach.
The condition for reach at 10' has been met and the condition of triggering an OA has been met at 10' when holding a whip.
Cast EB - War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of make an opportunity attack.
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack. The spell must have a casting time of 1 action and must target only that creature.
This closes the loop on the action. We've covered that the OA is triggered at 10' because of your whip reach, and we've covered that when you get an OA with War Caster you can cast a spell instead. As long as the spellcasting requirements are met (range/components), then you can cast your spell in this case.
EB's requirements are verbal and somatic. As long as you can speak and have a hand free for your somatic component, then you can cast it.
All conditions have been met (OA at 10' from whip, cast spell instead of attack), so this combo works.
NB: An Opportunity Attack will not be triggered by an adjacent enemy (at 5') moving to 10' as they have not left your reach of 10'.
Consideration of the implication of Weapon as spellcasting focus
There are two considerations that need be addressed here:
Can you use the Reach property of a whip when you are not wielding it as a weapon, but solely using it as a spellcasting? This will only work if you are holding the focus(weapon) like you'd hold a weapon normally. The reach property is for a weapon wielded, not for something that you just 'touch' like a component pouch. But from a mechanics viewpoint, you are holding the weapon in a hand which is the same thing as wielding it. It's only an issue if you have your hands full - but then you aren't holding/wielding the focus/weapon anyway and you can neither use it as a focus nor a weapon.
Do you need it for the spellcasting? In this case, the answer is no. EB does not have a material component, so the focus isn't required for casting.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142229%2fcan-you-combine-war-caster-whip-and-warlock-features-to-eldritch-blast-enemies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, but Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary.
When an enemy moves out of your reach, it provokes an opportunity attack from you, so when an enemy leaves the reach of your whip (by moving beyond 10 feet away from you) it provokes an opportunity attack from you (rules on Combat):
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
If you have the War Caster feat, when an enemy provokes an opportunity attack from you due to movement, you can forego the opportunity attack and instead use your reaction to cast an eligible spell such as eldritch blast (rules on War Caster):
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack.
So, yes, your intended tactic works: the enemy provokes an opportunity attack due to movement, so instead of making an opportunity attack you use your reaction to cast eldritch blast.
However, it's completely irrelevant whether the whip is your spellcasting focus or not. With War Caster, you can provide the somatic components of eldritch blast even if your hands are full of weapons. With Improved Pact Weapon, you could provide the material components of a spell using your pact weapon as your focus, but eldritch blast doesn't have material components, so Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary to be able to make this tactic work.
All you need is the War Caster feat and a whip.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, but Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary.
When an enemy moves out of your reach, it provokes an opportunity attack from you, so when an enemy leaves the reach of your whip (by moving beyond 10 feet away from you) it provokes an opportunity attack from you (rules on Combat):
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
If you have the War Caster feat, when an enemy provokes an opportunity attack from you due to movement, you can forego the opportunity attack and instead use your reaction to cast an eligible spell such as eldritch blast (rules on War Caster):
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack.
So, yes, your intended tactic works: the enemy provokes an opportunity attack due to movement, so instead of making an opportunity attack you use your reaction to cast eldritch blast.
However, it's completely irrelevant whether the whip is your spellcasting focus or not. With War Caster, you can provide the somatic components of eldritch blast even if your hands are full of weapons. With Improved Pact Weapon, you could provide the material components of a spell using your pact weapon as your focus, but eldritch blast doesn't have material components, so Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary to be able to make this tactic work.
All you need is the War Caster feat and a whip.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, but Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary.
When an enemy moves out of your reach, it provokes an opportunity attack from you, so when an enemy leaves the reach of your whip (by moving beyond 10 feet away from you) it provokes an opportunity attack from you (rules on Combat):
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
If you have the War Caster feat, when an enemy provokes an opportunity attack from you due to movement, you can forego the opportunity attack and instead use your reaction to cast an eligible spell such as eldritch blast (rules on War Caster):
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack.
So, yes, your intended tactic works: the enemy provokes an opportunity attack due to movement, so instead of making an opportunity attack you use your reaction to cast eldritch blast.
However, it's completely irrelevant whether the whip is your spellcasting focus or not. With War Caster, you can provide the somatic components of eldritch blast even if your hands are full of weapons. With Improved Pact Weapon, you could provide the material components of a spell using your pact weapon as your focus, but eldritch blast doesn't have material components, so Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary to be able to make this tactic work.
All you need is the War Caster feat and a whip.
$endgroup$
Yes, but Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary.
When an enemy moves out of your reach, it provokes an opportunity attack from you, so when an enemy leaves the reach of your whip (by moving beyond 10 feet away from you) it provokes an opportunity attack from you (rules on Combat):
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
If you have the War Caster feat, when an enemy provokes an opportunity attack from you due to movement, you can forego the opportunity attack and instead use your reaction to cast an eligible spell such as eldritch blast (rules on War Caster):
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack.
So, yes, your intended tactic works: the enemy provokes an opportunity attack due to movement, so instead of making an opportunity attack you use your reaction to cast eldritch blast.
However, it's completely irrelevant whether the whip is your spellcasting focus or not. With War Caster, you can provide the somatic components of eldritch blast even if your hands are full of weapons. With Improved Pact Weapon, you could provide the material components of a spell using your pact weapon as your focus, but eldritch blast doesn't have material components, so Improved Pact Weapon isn't necessary to be able to make this tactic work.
All you need is the War Caster feat and a whip.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
BloodcinderBloodcinder
21.2k372132
21.2k372132
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
would you be able to target any creature with that eldritch blast (since it can have multiple targets), or would you have to target the creature you are reacting to?
$endgroup$
– bubbajake00
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's a separate question. If you ask it as a separate question, I can answer it. However, the text of the War Caster feature is extremely explicit and answers your curiosity, so just go read that.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, all requirements are met
Let's look at the sequence of action and of the logic here:
Enemy is at 10' away - They are currently in your active reach if you are wielding a whip because it has the Reach property which extends your reach when using it to 10' .
This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it, as well as when determining your reach for opportunity attacks with it.
Enemy moves further away - This triggers an Opportunity Attack
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
The PHB Errata also confirms this:
This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
At this point, we know that when wielding a whip you have a 10' reach and that OAs are triggered when a creature leaves your reach.
The condition for reach at 10' has been met and the condition of triggering an OA has been met at 10' when holding a whip.
Cast EB - War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of make an opportunity attack.
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack. The spell must have a casting time of 1 action and must target only that creature.
This closes the loop on the action. We've covered that the OA is triggered at 10' because of your whip reach, and we've covered that when you get an OA with War Caster you can cast a spell instead. As long as the spellcasting requirements are met (range/components), then you can cast your spell in this case.
EB's requirements are verbal and somatic. As long as you can speak and have a hand free for your somatic component, then you can cast it.
All conditions have been met (OA at 10' from whip, cast spell instead of attack), so this combo works.
NB: An Opportunity Attack will not be triggered by an adjacent enemy (at 5') moving to 10' as they have not left your reach of 10'.
Consideration of the implication of Weapon as spellcasting focus
There are two considerations that need be addressed here:
Can you use the Reach property of a whip when you are not wielding it as a weapon, but solely using it as a spellcasting? This will only work if you are holding the focus(weapon) like you'd hold a weapon normally. The reach property is for a weapon wielded, not for something that you just 'touch' like a component pouch. But from a mechanics viewpoint, you are holding the weapon in a hand which is the same thing as wielding it. It's only an issue if you have your hands full - but then you aren't holding/wielding the focus/weapon anyway and you can neither use it as a focus nor a weapon.
Do you need it for the spellcasting? In this case, the answer is no. EB does not have a material component, so the focus isn't required for casting.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, all requirements are met
Let's look at the sequence of action and of the logic here:
Enemy is at 10' away - They are currently in your active reach if you are wielding a whip because it has the Reach property which extends your reach when using it to 10' .
This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it, as well as when determining your reach for opportunity attacks with it.
Enemy moves further away - This triggers an Opportunity Attack
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
The PHB Errata also confirms this:
This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
At this point, we know that when wielding a whip you have a 10' reach and that OAs are triggered when a creature leaves your reach.
The condition for reach at 10' has been met and the condition of triggering an OA has been met at 10' when holding a whip.
Cast EB - War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of make an opportunity attack.
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack. The spell must have a casting time of 1 action and must target only that creature.
This closes the loop on the action. We've covered that the OA is triggered at 10' because of your whip reach, and we've covered that when you get an OA with War Caster you can cast a spell instead. As long as the spellcasting requirements are met (range/components), then you can cast your spell in this case.
EB's requirements are verbal and somatic. As long as you can speak and have a hand free for your somatic component, then you can cast it.
All conditions have been met (OA at 10' from whip, cast spell instead of attack), so this combo works.
NB: An Opportunity Attack will not be triggered by an adjacent enemy (at 5') moving to 10' as they have not left your reach of 10'.
Consideration of the implication of Weapon as spellcasting focus
There are two considerations that need be addressed here:
Can you use the Reach property of a whip when you are not wielding it as a weapon, but solely using it as a spellcasting? This will only work if you are holding the focus(weapon) like you'd hold a weapon normally. The reach property is for a weapon wielded, not for something that you just 'touch' like a component pouch. But from a mechanics viewpoint, you are holding the weapon in a hand which is the same thing as wielding it. It's only an issue if you have your hands full - but then you aren't holding/wielding the focus/weapon anyway and you can neither use it as a focus nor a weapon.
Do you need it for the spellcasting? In this case, the answer is no. EB does not have a material component, so the focus isn't required for casting.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, all requirements are met
Let's look at the sequence of action and of the logic here:
Enemy is at 10' away - They are currently in your active reach if you are wielding a whip because it has the Reach property which extends your reach when using it to 10' .
This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it, as well as when determining your reach for opportunity attacks with it.
Enemy moves further away - This triggers an Opportunity Attack
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
The PHB Errata also confirms this:
This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
At this point, we know that when wielding a whip you have a 10' reach and that OAs are triggered when a creature leaves your reach.
The condition for reach at 10' has been met and the condition of triggering an OA has been met at 10' when holding a whip.
Cast EB - War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of make an opportunity attack.
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack. The spell must have a casting time of 1 action and must target only that creature.
This closes the loop on the action. We've covered that the OA is triggered at 10' because of your whip reach, and we've covered that when you get an OA with War Caster you can cast a spell instead. As long as the spellcasting requirements are met (range/components), then you can cast your spell in this case.
EB's requirements are verbal and somatic. As long as you can speak and have a hand free for your somatic component, then you can cast it.
All conditions have been met (OA at 10' from whip, cast spell instead of attack), so this combo works.
NB: An Opportunity Attack will not be triggered by an adjacent enemy (at 5') moving to 10' as they have not left your reach of 10'.
Consideration of the implication of Weapon as spellcasting focus
There are two considerations that need be addressed here:
Can you use the Reach property of a whip when you are not wielding it as a weapon, but solely using it as a spellcasting? This will only work if you are holding the focus(weapon) like you'd hold a weapon normally. The reach property is for a weapon wielded, not for something that you just 'touch' like a component pouch. But from a mechanics viewpoint, you are holding the weapon in a hand which is the same thing as wielding it. It's only an issue if you have your hands full - but then you aren't holding/wielding the focus/weapon anyway and you can neither use it as a focus nor a weapon.
Do you need it for the spellcasting? In this case, the answer is no. EB does not have a material component, so the focus isn't required for casting.
$endgroup$
Yes, all requirements are met
Let's look at the sequence of action and of the logic here:
Enemy is at 10' away - They are currently in your active reach if you are wielding a whip because it has the Reach property which extends your reach when using it to 10' .
This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it, as well as when determining your reach for opportunity attacks with it.
Enemy moves further away - This triggers an Opportunity Attack
You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.
The PHB Errata also confirms this:
This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
At this point, we know that when wielding a whip you have a 10' reach and that OAs are triggered when a creature leaves your reach.
The condition for reach at 10' has been met and the condition of triggering an OA has been met at 10' when holding a whip.
Cast EB - War Caster lets you cast a spell instead of make an opportunity attack.
When a hostile creature's movement provokes an opportunity attack from you, you can use your reaction to cast a spell at the creature, rather than making an opportunity attack. The spell must have a casting time of 1 action and must target only that creature.
This closes the loop on the action. We've covered that the OA is triggered at 10' because of your whip reach, and we've covered that when you get an OA with War Caster you can cast a spell instead. As long as the spellcasting requirements are met (range/components), then you can cast your spell in this case.
EB's requirements are verbal and somatic. As long as you can speak and have a hand free for your somatic component, then you can cast it.
All conditions have been met (OA at 10' from whip, cast spell instead of attack), so this combo works.
NB: An Opportunity Attack will not be triggered by an adjacent enemy (at 5') moving to 10' as they have not left your reach of 10'.
Consideration of the implication of Weapon as spellcasting focus
There are two considerations that need be addressed here:
Can you use the Reach property of a whip when you are not wielding it as a weapon, but solely using it as a spellcasting? This will only work if you are holding the focus(weapon) like you'd hold a weapon normally. The reach property is for a weapon wielded, not for something that you just 'touch' like a component pouch. But from a mechanics viewpoint, you are holding the weapon in a hand which is the same thing as wielding it. It's only an issue if you have your hands full - but then you aren't holding/wielding the focus/weapon anyway and you can neither use it as a focus nor a weapon.
Do you need it for the spellcasting? In this case, the answer is no. EB does not have a material component, so the focus isn't required for casting.
edited 4 hours ago
ANeves
1054
1054
answered 10 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
58k8206385
58k8206385
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142229%2fcan-you-combine-war-caster-whip-and-warlock-features-to-eldritch-blast-enemies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch That would be the simplest such case, yes. If they're somehow doing something else that might provoke an opportunity attack when standing 10 feet away, the question is also asking abut that. Also, specifically it's about using the warcaster ability in that case with a spell that does not normally have a weapon component - not greenflame blade or booming blade.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: War Caster, a whip and a dagger, and provoking Opportunity Attacks
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BenBarden Due to the contention surrounding these answers, I might suggest that you hold off on marking mine correct quite so soon, even if I do happen to think my answer is correct. It might be a bit premature if we suss out additional relevant rules/errata that affect the answer. Just my suggestion.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Bloodcinder fair. The logic seems pretty clear to me, based on what you presented, but it's true that there could have been pertinent rulings.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
10 hours ago