Why do TACANs not have a symbol for compulsory reporting on IFR Enroute Low Altitude charts?












4












$begingroup$


I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



enter image description here





Edit: Plot twist:



They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
enter image description here



Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



    enter image description here





    Edit: Plot twist:



    They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
    enter image description here



    Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



      enter image description here





      Edit: Plot twist:



      They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
      enter image description here



      Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



      enter image description here





      Edit: Plot twist:



      They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
      enter image description here



      Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?







      aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 33 mins ago







      Ryan Mortensen

















      asked 8 hours ago









      Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen

      3,515840




      3,515840






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "528"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63801%2fwhy-do-tacans-not-have-a-symbol-for-compulsory-reporting-on-ifr-enroute-low-alti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago
















          6












          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago














          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          CrossRoadsCrossRoads

          5,1521919




          5,1521919












          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
          $endgroup$
          – pericynthion
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
          $endgroup$
          – pericynthion
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63801%2fwhy-do-tacans-not-have-a-symbol-for-compulsory-reporting-on-ifr-enroute-low-alti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

          Berlina muro

          Berlina aerponto