What to do when QA team has no test case documentation?












2















I just started working as a QA Automation Engineer to a certain company which provides ERP and CRM services. However, I recently discovered that they have no test case documentation for the testing they do, and just report bugs. I am now having a hard time to automate their tests because I have no reference, what do you think I should do?









share









New contributor




Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    2















    I just started working as a QA Automation Engineer to a certain company which provides ERP and CRM services. However, I recently discovered that they have no test case documentation for the testing they do, and just report bugs. I am now having a hard time to automate their tests because I have no reference, what do you think I should do?









    share









    New contributor




    Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      2












      2








      2








      I just started working as a QA Automation Engineer to a certain company which provides ERP and CRM services. However, I recently discovered that they have no test case documentation for the testing they do, and just report bugs. I am now having a hard time to automate their tests because I have no reference, what do you think I should do?









      share









      New contributor




      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I just started working as a QA Automation Engineer to a certain company which provides ERP and CRM services. However, I recently discovered that they have no test case documentation for the testing they do, and just report bugs. I am now having a hard time to automate their tests because I have no reference, what do you think I should do?







      automated-testing test-automation-framework qa-role qa-process





      share









      New contributor




      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share









      New contributor




      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share








      edited 3 hours ago









      Niels van Reijmersdal

      22k23176




      22k23176






      New contributor




      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 5 hours ago









      Kit SabadoKit Sabado

      161




      161




      New contributor




      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Kit Sabado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          You could tackle that from two directions. You could take the bugs and ask the people who opened the bugs how to reproduce them. There is your testcase. You can probably start automating regression tests for these bugs immediately.



          Or you could just write the testcases yourself based on the documents and SUT you have. Maybe there is a business capability map for which you can write happy path tests or maybe you have userstories with acceptance criteria for which testcases can be written. Or you go through the SUT and look what it should do.



          I usually take the approach that the test code is the test case and with a BDD framework you can more easily create test cases that are pretty readable and can be understood by the developers and management.



          In conclusion: write the test cases yourself, focus on bug regression and happy path. use a bdd framework to write testcases. get help from people who know the features and created the bugs.



          see also http://xunitpatterns.com/TestAutomationRoadmap.html






          share|improve this answer


























          • +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

            – Niels van Reijmersdal
            3 hours ago



















          0














          Mindmap all the high-level features of the application together with business owners. Go over the map with stakeholders (e.g users, developers, managers, and sponsors). Do a risk assessment with some key people, maybe also analyze brittle areas based on defect reports.




          • Write automated happy-path tests for the highest risk features first.

          • Create a test-automation debt backlog, prioritize with stakeholders

          • In the meantime write automated tests for past critical defects as well.

          • Train developers to write automated tests for new features to stop fill the gap of missing tests.






          share|improve this answer































            0














            Test Automation is not about having or not having test cases, which you can automate. This is about you deciding on test automation strategy. I wrote a blog post, which has several links and ideas where to start. I hope it helps.






            share|improve this answer
























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "244"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              Kit Sabado is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsqa.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38976%2fwhat-to-do-when-qa-team-has-no-test-case-documentation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1














              You could tackle that from two directions. You could take the bugs and ask the people who opened the bugs how to reproduce them. There is your testcase. You can probably start automating regression tests for these bugs immediately.



              Or you could just write the testcases yourself based on the documents and SUT you have. Maybe there is a business capability map for which you can write happy path tests or maybe you have userstories with acceptance criteria for which testcases can be written. Or you go through the SUT and look what it should do.



              I usually take the approach that the test code is the test case and with a BDD framework you can more easily create test cases that are pretty readable and can be understood by the developers and management.



              In conclusion: write the test cases yourself, focus on bug regression and happy path. use a bdd framework to write testcases. get help from people who know the features and created the bugs.



              see also http://xunitpatterns.com/TestAutomationRoadmap.html






              share|improve this answer


























              • +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

                – Niels van Reijmersdal
                3 hours ago
















              1














              You could tackle that from two directions. You could take the bugs and ask the people who opened the bugs how to reproduce them. There is your testcase. You can probably start automating regression tests for these bugs immediately.



              Or you could just write the testcases yourself based on the documents and SUT you have. Maybe there is a business capability map for which you can write happy path tests or maybe you have userstories with acceptance criteria for which testcases can be written. Or you go through the SUT and look what it should do.



              I usually take the approach that the test code is the test case and with a BDD framework you can more easily create test cases that are pretty readable and can be understood by the developers and management.



              In conclusion: write the test cases yourself, focus on bug regression and happy path. use a bdd framework to write testcases. get help from people who know the features and created the bugs.



              see also http://xunitpatterns.com/TestAutomationRoadmap.html






              share|improve this answer


























              • +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

                – Niels van Reijmersdal
                3 hours ago














              1












              1








              1







              You could tackle that from two directions. You could take the bugs and ask the people who opened the bugs how to reproduce them. There is your testcase. You can probably start automating regression tests for these bugs immediately.



              Or you could just write the testcases yourself based on the documents and SUT you have. Maybe there is a business capability map for which you can write happy path tests or maybe you have userstories with acceptance criteria for which testcases can be written. Or you go through the SUT and look what it should do.



              I usually take the approach that the test code is the test case and with a BDD framework you can more easily create test cases that are pretty readable and can be understood by the developers and management.



              In conclusion: write the test cases yourself, focus on bug regression and happy path. use a bdd framework to write testcases. get help from people who know the features and created the bugs.



              see also http://xunitpatterns.com/TestAutomationRoadmap.html






              share|improve this answer















              You could tackle that from two directions. You could take the bugs and ask the people who opened the bugs how to reproduce them. There is your testcase. You can probably start automating regression tests for these bugs immediately.



              Or you could just write the testcases yourself based on the documents and SUT you have. Maybe there is a business capability map for which you can write happy path tests or maybe you have userstories with acceptance criteria for which testcases can be written. Or you go through the SUT and look what it should do.



              I usually take the approach that the test code is the test case and with a BDD framework you can more easily create test cases that are pretty readable and can be understood by the developers and management.



              In conclusion: write the test cases yourself, focus on bug regression and happy path. use a bdd framework to write testcases. get help from people who know the features and created the bugs.



              see also http://xunitpatterns.com/TestAutomationRoadmap.html







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 4 hours ago

























              answered 4 hours ago









              globalwormingglobalworming

              1917




              1917













              • +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

                – Niels van Reijmersdal
                3 hours ago



















              • +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

                – Niels van Reijmersdal
                3 hours ago

















              +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

              – Niels van Reijmersdal
              3 hours ago





              +1 for the test code should become the test-cases, make sure they are readable.

              – Niels van Reijmersdal
              3 hours ago











              0














              Mindmap all the high-level features of the application together with business owners. Go over the map with stakeholders (e.g users, developers, managers, and sponsors). Do a risk assessment with some key people, maybe also analyze brittle areas based on defect reports.




              • Write automated happy-path tests for the highest risk features first.

              • Create a test-automation debt backlog, prioritize with stakeholders

              • In the meantime write automated tests for past critical defects as well.

              • Train developers to write automated tests for new features to stop fill the gap of missing tests.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Mindmap all the high-level features of the application together with business owners. Go over the map with stakeholders (e.g users, developers, managers, and sponsors). Do a risk assessment with some key people, maybe also analyze brittle areas based on defect reports.




                • Write automated happy-path tests for the highest risk features first.

                • Create a test-automation debt backlog, prioritize with stakeholders

                • In the meantime write automated tests for past critical defects as well.

                • Train developers to write automated tests for new features to stop fill the gap of missing tests.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Mindmap all the high-level features of the application together with business owners. Go over the map with stakeholders (e.g users, developers, managers, and sponsors). Do a risk assessment with some key people, maybe also analyze brittle areas based on defect reports.




                  • Write automated happy-path tests for the highest risk features first.

                  • Create a test-automation debt backlog, prioritize with stakeholders

                  • In the meantime write automated tests for past critical defects as well.

                  • Train developers to write automated tests for new features to stop fill the gap of missing tests.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Mindmap all the high-level features of the application together with business owners. Go over the map with stakeholders (e.g users, developers, managers, and sponsors). Do a risk assessment with some key people, maybe also analyze brittle areas based on defect reports.




                  • Write automated happy-path tests for the highest risk features first.

                  • Create a test-automation debt backlog, prioritize with stakeholders

                  • In the meantime write automated tests for past critical defects as well.

                  • Train developers to write automated tests for new features to stop fill the gap of missing tests.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Niels van ReijmersdalNiels van Reijmersdal

                  22k23176




                  22k23176























                      0














                      Test Automation is not about having or not having test cases, which you can automate. This is about you deciding on test automation strategy. I wrote a blog post, which has several links and ideas where to start. I hope it helps.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        0














                        Test Automation is not about having or not having test cases, which you can automate. This is about you deciding on test automation strategy. I wrote a blog post, which has several links and ideas where to start. I hope it helps.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Test Automation is not about having or not having test cases, which you can automate. This is about you deciding on test automation strategy. I wrote a blog post, which has several links and ideas where to start. I hope it helps.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Test Automation is not about having or not having test cases, which you can automate. This is about you deciding on test automation strategy. I wrote a blog post, which has several links and ideas where to start. I hope it helps.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 11 mins ago









                          kriscorbuskriscorbus

                          301111




                          301111






















                              Kit Sabado is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              Kit Sabado is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              Kit Sabado is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Kit Sabado is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Software Quality Assurance & Testing Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsqa.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38976%2fwhat-to-do-when-qa-team-has-no-test-case-documentation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                              Berlina muro

                              Berlina aerponto