The physical meaning of a symplectic form.












5












$begingroup$


So I've studied a bit about symplectic geometry, and I know that phase space is a symplectic manifold, and the symplectic form induces a poisson bracket. However, what is the physical meaning of the symplectic form? Perhaps it's simply the same as asking what the meaning is of the poisson bracket. What does the poisson bracket say about a system? And what is the physical meaning of observables?






differential-geometry classical-mechanics symplectic-geometry







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Have you looked at the first chapter of McDuff and Salamon's book on symplectic topology? I don't know if that will answer your question but it should be useful.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    a little bit, just scanned through it
    $endgroup$
    – AkatsukiMaliki
    3 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


So I've studied a bit about symplectic geometry, and I know that phase space is a symplectic manifold, and the symplectic form induces a poisson bracket. However, what is the physical meaning of the symplectic form? Perhaps it's simply the same as asking what the meaning is of the poisson bracket. What does the poisson bracket say about a system? And what is the physical meaning of observables?






differential-geometry classical-mechanics symplectic-geometry







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Have you looked at the first chapter of McDuff and Salamon's book on symplectic topology? I don't know if that will answer your question but it should be useful.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    a little bit, just scanned through it
    $endgroup$
    – AkatsukiMaliki
    3 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


So I've studied a bit about symplectic geometry, and I know that phase space is a symplectic manifold, and the symplectic form induces a poisson bracket. However, what is the physical meaning of the symplectic form? Perhaps it's simply the same as asking what the meaning is of the poisson bracket. What does the poisson bracket say about a system? And what is the physical meaning of observables?






differential-geometry classical-mechanics symplectic-geometry







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




So I've studied a bit about symplectic geometry, and I know that phase space is a symplectic manifold, and the symplectic form induces a poisson bracket. However, what is the physical meaning of the symplectic form? Perhaps it's simply the same as asking what the meaning is of the poisson bracket. What does the poisson bracket say about a system? And what is the physical meaning of observables?






differential-geometry classical-mechanics symplectic-geometry




differential-geometry classical-mechanics symplectic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









AkatsukiMalikiAkatsukiMaliki

338110




338110








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Have you looked at the first chapter of McDuff and Salamon's book on symplectic topology? I don't know if that will answer your question but it should be useful.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    a little bit, just scanned through it
    $endgroup$
    – AkatsukiMaliki
    3 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Have you looked at the first chapter of McDuff and Salamon's book on symplectic topology? I don't know if that will answer your question but it should be useful.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Miller
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    a little bit, just scanned through it
    $endgroup$
    – AkatsukiMaliki
    3 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Have you looked at the first chapter of McDuff and Salamon's book on symplectic topology? I don't know if that will answer your question but it should be useful.
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
Have you looked at the first chapter of McDuff and Salamon's book on symplectic topology? I don't know if that will answer your question but it should be useful.
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
3 hours ago














$begingroup$
a little bit, just scanned through it
$endgroup$
– AkatsukiMaliki
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
a little bit, just scanned through it
$endgroup$
– AkatsukiMaliki
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

This topic is incredibly deep so my answer barely skims the surface, however I believe you're looking for an intuitive meaning of the symplectic form. Consider the standard symplectic form



$$
omega = sum_i d x_i wedge d lambda_i
$$



This can also be written as



$$
omega = begin{bmatrix}
mathbf{0} & mathbf{I} \
-mathbf{I} & mathbf{0}
end{bmatrix}
$$



Now consider a rotation matrix



$$
R_theta = begin{bmatrix}
cos(theta) & sin(theta) \
-sin(theta) & cos(theta)
end{bmatrix}
$$



By setting $theta = 90^o$, you find the data of these tensors are equivalent. Ergo the standard symplectic form is very similar to a rotation matrix that rotates vectors by 90 degrees. Consider the symplectic form of Hamiltonian mechanics



$$
dH = iota_{X_H} omega
$$



where $dH$ is the exterior derivative of the Hamiltonian and $iota$ is the interior derivative. This exterior derivative generates a covector field whose covectors point in the direction of steepest descent. Rotate these covectors by 90 degrees and they point tangential to the level sets of $H$. In Hamiltonian mechanics, motion almost always lies on level sets of $H$.



Ultimately, I like to think about the symplectic form as a rotation matrix that properly encodes the structure of mechanics, but be aware that due to its differential geometric nature, it's much deeper than I lead on.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096840%2fthe-physical-meaning-of-a-symplectic-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    This topic is incredibly deep so my answer barely skims the surface, however I believe you're looking for an intuitive meaning of the symplectic form. Consider the standard symplectic form



    $$
    omega = sum_i d x_i wedge d lambda_i
    $$



    This can also be written as



    $$
    omega = begin{bmatrix}
    mathbf{0} & mathbf{I} \
    -mathbf{I} & mathbf{0}
    end{bmatrix}
    $$



    Now consider a rotation matrix



    $$
    R_theta = begin{bmatrix}
    cos(theta) & sin(theta) \
    -sin(theta) & cos(theta)
    end{bmatrix}
    $$



    By setting $theta = 90^o$, you find the data of these tensors are equivalent. Ergo the standard symplectic form is very similar to a rotation matrix that rotates vectors by 90 degrees. Consider the symplectic form of Hamiltonian mechanics



    $$
    dH = iota_{X_H} omega
    $$



    where $dH$ is the exterior derivative of the Hamiltonian and $iota$ is the interior derivative. This exterior derivative generates a covector field whose covectors point in the direction of steepest descent. Rotate these covectors by 90 degrees and they point tangential to the level sets of $H$. In Hamiltonian mechanics, motion almost always lies on level sets of $H$.



    Ultimately, I like to think about the symplectic form as a rotation matrix that properly encodes the structure of mechanics, but be aware that due to its differential geometric nature, it's much deeper than I lead on.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      This topic is incredibly deep so my answer barely skims the surface, however I believe you're looking for an intuitive meaning of the symplectic form. Consider the standard symplectic form



      $$
      omega = sum_i d x_i wedge d lambda_i
      $$



      This can also be written as



      $$
      omega = begin{bmatrix}
      mathbf{0} & mathbf{I} \
      -mathbf{I} & mathbf{0}
      end{bmatrix}
      $$



      Now consider a rotation matrix



      $$
      R_theta = begin{bmatrix}
      cos(theta) & sin(theta) \
      -sin(theta) & cos(theta)
      end{bmatrix}
      $$



      By setting $theta = 90^o$, you find the data of these tensors are equivalent. Ergo the standard symplectic form is very similar to a rotation matrix that rotates vectors by 90 degrees. Consider the symplectic form of Hamiltonian mechanics



      $$
      dH = iota_{X_H} omega
      $$



      where $dH$ is the exterior derivative of the Hamiltonian and $iota$ is the interior derivative. This exterior derivative generates a covector field whose covectors point in the direction of steepest descent. Rotate these covectors by 90 degrees and they point tangential to the level sets of $H$. In Hamiltonian mechanics, motion almost always lies on level sets of $H$.



      Ultimately, I like to think about the symplectic form as a rotation matrix that properly encodes the structure of mechanics, but be aware that due to its differential geometric nature, it's much deeper than I lead on.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        This topic is incredibly deep so my answer barely skims the surface, however I believe you're looking for an intuitive meaning of the symplectic form. Consider the standard symplectic form



        $$
        omega = sum_i d x_i wedge d lambda_i
        $$



        This can also be written as



        $$
        omega = begin{bmatrix}
        mathbf{0} & mathbf{I} \
        -mathbf{I} & mathbf{0}
        end{bmatrix}
        $$



        Now consider a rotation matrix



        $$
        R_theta = begin{bmatrix}
        cos(theta) & sin(theta) \
        -sin(theta) & cos(theta)
        end{bmatrix}
        $$



        By setting $theta = 90^o$, you find the data of these tensors are equivalent. Ergo the standard symplectic form is very similar to a rotation matrix that rotates vectors by 90 degrees. Consider the symplectic form of Hamiltonian mechanics



        $$
        dH = iota_{X_H} omega
        $$



        where $dH$ is the exterior derivative of the Hamiltonian and $iota$ is the interior derivative. This exterior derivative generates a covector field whose covectors point in the direction of steepest descent. Rotate these covectors by 90 degrees and they point tangential to the level sets of $H$. In Hamiltonian mechanics, motion almost always lies on level sets of $H$.



        Ultimately, I like to think about the symplectic form as a rotation matrix that properly encodes the structure of mechanics, but be aware that due to its differential geometric nature, it's much deeper than I lead on.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This topic is incredibly deep so my answer barely skims the surface, however I believe you're looking for an intuitive meaning of the symplectic form. Consider the standard symplectic form



        $$
        omega = sum_i d x_i wedge d lambda_i
        $$



        This can also be written as



        $$
        omega = begin{bmatrix}
        mathbf{0} & mathbf{I} \
        -mathbf{I} & mathbf{0}
        end{bmatrix}
        $$



        Now consider a rotation matrix



        $$
        R_theta = begin{bmatrix}
        cos(theta) & sin(theta) \
        -sin(theta) & cos(theta)
        end{bmatrix}
        $$



        By setting $theta = 90^o$, you find the data of these tensors are equivalent. Ergo the standard symplectic form is very similar to a rotation matrix that rotates vectors by 90 degrees. Consider the symplectic form of Hamiltonian mechanics



        $$
        dH = iota_{X_H} omega
        $$



        where $dH$ is the exterior derivative of the Hamiltonian and $iota$ is the interior derivative. This exterior derivative generates a covector field whose covectors point in the direction of steepest descent. Rotate these covectors by 90 degrees and they point tangential to the level sets of $H$. In Hamiltonian mechanics, motion almost always lies on level sets of $H$.



        Ultimately, I like to think about the symplectic form as a rotation matrix that properly encodes the structure of mechanics, but be aware that due to its differential geometric nature, it's much deeper than I lead on.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        Michael SparapanyMichael Sparapany

        715




        715






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096840%2fthe-physical-meaning-of-a-symplectic-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75 ...
            Read more

            Berlina muro

            Image
            La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l...
            Read more

            Berlina aerponto

            Image
            Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa...
            Read more