How many terms of the Maclaurin series for $ln(1+x)$ do you need to use to estimate $ln(1.4)$ to within...
$begingroup$
My question:
How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?
I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.
So my process is this:
- find the general formula for this series
- If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001
- I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.
Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?
I have the derivatives of each:
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{1+x}$$
$$f''(x) = frac{-1}{(1+x)^2}$$
$$f'''(x) = frac{2(1+x)}{(1+x)^4} = frac{2}{(1+x)^3}$$
$$f^{iv}(x) = frac{-6}{(1+x)^4}$$
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question:
How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?
I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.
So my process is this:
- find the general formula for this series
- If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001
- I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.
Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?
I have the derivatives of each:
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{1+x}$$
$$f''(x) = frac{-1}{(1+x)^2}$$
$$f'''(x) = frac{2(1+x)}{(1+x)^4} = frac{2}{(1+x)^3}$$
$$f^{iv}(x) = frac{-6}{(1+x)^4}$$
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question:
How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?
I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.
So my process is this:
- find the general formula for this series
- If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001
- I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.
Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?
I have the derivatives of each:
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{1+x}$$
$$f''(x) = frac{-1}{(1+x)^2}$$
$$f'''(x) = frac{2(1+x)}{(1+x)^4} = frac{2}{(1+x)^3}$$
$$f^{iv}(x) = frac{-6}{(1+x)^4}$$
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
My question:
How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?
I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.
So my process is this:
- find the general formula for this series
- If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001
- I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.
Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?
I have the derivatives of each:
$$f'(x) = frac{1}{1+x}$$
$$f''(x) = frac{-1}{(1+x)^2}$$
$$f'''(x) = frac{2(1+x)}{(1+x)^4} = frac{2}{(1+x)^3}$$
$$f^{iv}(x) = frac{-6}{(1+x)^4}$$
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
edited 1 min ago
TheSimpliFire
13.2k62464
13.2k62464
asked 1 hour ago
Jwan622Jwan622
2,41111632
2,41111632
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.
Use directly
- classical Taylor expansion :
$$ln(1+x)=x-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{3}-tfrac{x^4}{4}-...tag{1}$$
with $x=0.4$ and
- the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).
The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such
$$tfrac{0.4^n}{n}leq 0.001$$
Due to the fact that $tfrac{0.4^6}{6} < 0.001 < tfrac{0.4^5}{5}$, we have $n=6$.
Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).
Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
$0.4-tfrac{0.4^2}{2}+tfrac{0.4^3}{3}-tfrac{0.4^4}{4}+tfrac{0.4^5}{5}=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_{k=0}^infty a_kx^k.$$
Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac1{1+x}$, and from the geometric series
$$ frac1{1+x}=sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
you ought to see that $a_k=frac{(-1)^{k-1}}k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
In other words, we find $n$ with $frac{0.4^n}{n}<0.001$ and then take $sum_{k=0}^{n-1}frac{-(-0.4)^k}k$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.
Explicitly,
$$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193207%2fhow-many-terms-of-the-maclaurin-series-for-ln1x-do-you-need-to-use-to-esti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.
Use directly
- classical Taylor expansion :
$$ln(1+x)=x-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{3}-tfrac{x^4}{4}-...tag{1}$$
with $x=0.4$ and
- the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).
The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such
$$tfrac{0.4^n}{n}leq 0.001$$
Due to the fact that $tfrac{0.4^6}{6} < 0.001 < tfrac{0.4^5}{5}$, we have $n=6$.
Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).
Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
$0.4-tfrac{0.4^2}{2}+tfrac{0.4^3}{3}-tfrac{0.4^4}{4}+tfrac{0.4^5}{5}=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.
Use directly
- classical Taylor expansion :
$$ln(1+x)=x-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{3}-tfrac{x^4}{4}-...tag{1}$$
with $x=0.4$ and
- the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).
The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such
$$tfrac{0.4^n}{n}leq 0.001$$
Due to the fact that $tfrac{0.4^6}{6} < 0.001 < tfrac{0.4^5}{5}$, we have $n=6$.
Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).
Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
$0.4-tfrac{0.4^2}{2}+tfrac{0.4^3}{3}-tfrac{0.4^4}{4}+tfrac{0.4^5}{5}=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.
Use directly
- classical Taylor expansion :
$$ln(1+x)=x-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{3}-tfrac{x^4}{4}-...tag{1}$$
with $x=0.4$ and
- the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).
The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such
$$tfrac{0.4^n}{n}leq 0.001$$
Due to the fact that $tfrac{0.4^6}{6} < 0.001 < tfrac{0.4^5}{5}$, we have $n=6$.
Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).
Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
$0.4-tfrac{0.4^2}{2}+tfrac{0.4^3}{3}-tfrac{0.4^4}{4}+tfrac{0.4^5}{5}=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.
$endgroup$
You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.
Use directly
- classical Taylor expansion :
$$ln(1+x)=x-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{3}-tfrac{x^4}{4}-...tag{1}$$
with $x=0.4$ and
- the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).
The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such
$$tfrac{0.4^n}{n}leq 0.001$$
Due to the fact that $tfrac{0.4^6}{6} < 0.001 < tfrac{0.4^5}{5}$, we have $n=6$.
Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).
Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
$0.4-tfrac{0.4^2}{2}+tfrac{0.4^3}{3}-tfrac{0.4^4}{4}+tfrac{0.4^5}{5}=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.
edited 10 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Jean MarieJean Marie
31.6k42355
31.6k42355
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_{k=0}^infty a_kx^k.$$
Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac1{1+x}$, and from the geometric series
$$ frac1{1+x}=sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
you ought to see that $a_k=frac{(-1)^{k-1}}k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
In other words, we find $n$ with $frac{0.4^n}{n}<0.001$ and then take $sum_{k=0}^{n-1}frac{-(-0.4)^k}k$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.
Explicitly,
$$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_{k=0}^infty a_kx^k.$$
Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac1{1+x}$, and from the geometric series
$$ frac1{1+x}=sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
you ought to see that $a_k=frac{(-1)^{k-1}}k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
In other words, we find $n$ with $frac{0.4^n}{n}<0.001$ and then take $sum_{k=0}^{n-1}frac{-(-0.4)^k}k$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.
Explicitly,
$$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_{k=0}^infty a_kx^k.$$
Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac1{1+x}$, and from the geometric series
$$ frac1{1+x}=sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
you ought to see that $a_k=frac{(-1)^{k-1}}k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
In other words, we find $n$ with $frac{0.4^n}{n}<0.001$ and then take $sum_{k=0}^{n-1}frac{-(-0.4)^k}k$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.
Explicitly,
$$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.
$endgroup$
First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_{k=0}^infty a_kx^k.$$
Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac1{1+x}$, and from the geometric series
$$ frac1{1+x}=sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
you ought to see that $a_k=frac{(-1)^{k-1}}k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
In other words, we find $n$ with $frac{0.4^n}{n}<0.001$ and then take $sum_{k=0}^{n-1}frac{-(-0.4)^k}k$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.
Explicitly,
$$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.
answered 54 mins ago
Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen
283k23273508
283k23273508
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193207%2fhow-many-terms-of-the-maclaurin-series-for-ln1x-do-you-need-to-use-to-esti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown