4 forms of mechanics












2












$begingroup$


There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    56 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    56 mins ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?







classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Semen YurchenkoSemen Yurchenko

183




183




New contributor




Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    56 mins ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
    $endgroup$
    – GiorgioP
    56 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago




$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here is one argument:




  1. Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.


  2. A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.


  3. On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    58 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455135%2f4-forms-of-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Here is one argument:




  1. Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.


  2. A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.


  3. On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    58 mins ago
















3












$begingroup$

Here is one argument:




  1. Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.


  2. A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.


  3. On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    58 mins ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Here is one argument:




  1. Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.


  2. A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.


  3. On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here is one argument:




  1. Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.


  2. A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.


  3. On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.








share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









QmechanicQmechanic

103k121841172




103k121841172












  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    58 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Semen Yurchenko
    58 mins ago
















$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago




$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago










Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455135%2f4-forms-of-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

Berlina muro

Berlina aerponto