4 forms of mechanics
$begingroup$
There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?
classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?
classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?
classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism
New contributor
$endgroup$
There are 4 main functions in mechanics. L(q,q',t), H(p,q,t), K(p',q',t), G(p,p',t). First two are Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. Second two are some kind of analogical to first two, but we don't use them. Every where they write that using them can cause problems. But why?
classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism
classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism hamiltonian-formalism
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Semen YurchenkoSemen Yurchenko
183
183
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is one argument:
Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.
A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.
On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455135%2f4-forms-of-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is one argument:
Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.
A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.
On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is one argument:
Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.
A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.
On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is one argument:
Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.
A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.
On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.
$endgroup$
Here is one argument:
Starting from Newton's 2nd law, the Lagrangian $L(q,v,t)$ is just one step away.
A Legendre transformation $vleftrightarrow p$ to the Hamiltonian $H(q,p,t)$ is well-defined for a wide class of systems because there is typically a bijective relation between velocity $v$ and momentum $p$.
On the other hand, there is seldomly a bijective relation between position $q$ and force $f$ (although Hooke's law is a notable exception). Therefore the Legendre transforms $K(f,v,t)$ and $G(f,p,t)$ are often ill-defined.
answered 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦Qmechanic
103k121841172
103k121841172
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
$begingroup$
Sounds reasonable, thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Semen Yurchenko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455135%2f4-forms-of-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You may find useful to have a look at this related question and answers: physics.stackexchange.com/q/415775
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hm, my question is different, I want to know, why is L and H and more preferable for us, while solving tasks
$endgroup$
– Semen Yurchenko
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
See point 3 in Qmechanic's answer.
$endgroup$
– GiorgioP
56 mins ago