representation of vector and matrix in latex












2















i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached enter image description here



can someone help me out with a way to represent it










share|improve this question









New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....

    – David Carlisle
    4 hours ago
















2















i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached enter image description here



can someone help me out with a way to represent it










share|improve this question









New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....

    – David Carlisle
    4 hours ago














2












2








2








i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached enter image description here



can someone help me out with a way to represent it










share|improve this question









New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












i'm working on my latex thesis and i want to represent this equation, matrix is upperCase letter with 2 lines under it, and vector just one line below, see the picture attached enter image description here



can someone help me out with a way to represent it







matrices vector






share|improve this question









New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Phelype Oleinik

25.5k54690




25.5k54690






New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









sana chsana ch

133




133




New contributor




sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






sana ch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2





    that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....

    – David Carlisle
    4 hours ago














  • 2





    that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....

    – David Carlisle
    4 hours ago








2




2





that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....

– David Carlisle
4 hours ago





that seems very much a "blackboard" notation, do you really want that in a typeset paper? (underline{.} and underline{underline{.}} probably do what you want but....

– David Carlisle
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}

% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor
newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}
newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}

% better for typesetting
%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm
%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

begin{document}

Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix
[
renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}
begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}
vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \
scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&
scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &
scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1
end{array}
]

end{document}


enter image description here



I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be



enter image description here



without changing the code in the document body.






share|improve this answer
























  • thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

    – sana ch
    2 hours ago



















1














The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.



The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
Q &= Aw \
mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\
mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\
vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\
bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

    – sana ch
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

    – Mico
    4 hours ago








  • 1





    @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

    – egreg
    3 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






sana ch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485372%2frepresentation-of-vector-and-matrix-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}

% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor
newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}
newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}

% better for typesetting
%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm
%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

begin{document}

Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix
[
renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}
begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}
vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \
scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&
scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &
scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1
end{array}
]

end{document}


enter image description here



I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be



enter image description here



without changing the code in the document body.






share|improve this answer
























  • thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

    – sana ch
    2 hours ago
















1














The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}

% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor
newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}
newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}

% better for typesetting
%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm
%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

begin{document}

Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix
[
renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}
begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}
vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \
scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&
scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &
scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1
end{array}
]

end{document}


enter image description here



I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be



enter image description here



without changing the code in the document body.






share|improve this answer
























  • thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

    – sana ch
    2 hours ago














1












1








1







The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}

% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor
newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}
newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}

% better for typesetting
%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm
%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

begin{document}

Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix
[
renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}
begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}
vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \
scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&
scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &
scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1
end{array}
]

end{document}


enter image description here



I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be



enter image description here



without changing the code in the document body.






share|improve this answer













The immediate problem can be solved with an array, with a local setting of arraystretch for reducing the gap between the two rows.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}

% old fashioned notation for the old fashioned supervisor
newcommand{vect}[1]{underline{#1}}
newcommand{matr}[1]{underline{underline{#1}}}

% better for typesetting
%newcommand{vect}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm
%newcommand{matr}[1]{mathbf{#1}} % or bm

begin{document}

Here $vect{Q}$ and $vect{w}$ are column vectors and $matr{A}$ is a matrix
[
renewcommand{arraystretch}{0.7}
begin{array}{@{} c @{} c @{} c @{;} c @{}}
vect{Q} & {}={} & matr{A} & vect{w} \
scriptscriptstyle mtimes 1 &&
scriptscriptstyle mtimes n &
scriptscriptstyle ntimes 1
end{array}
]

end{document}


enter image description here



I strongly advise to use macros for inputting matrices and vectors. When your supervisor will realize that the old-fashioned notation is also very ugly in print (it was used in the typewriter times), you can simply change the definitions. If you switch the comments in the code above, the result will be



enter image description here



without changing the code in the document body.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









egregegreg

735k8919343257




735k8919343257













  • thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

    – sana ch
    2 hours ago



















  • thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

    – sana ch
    2 hours ago

















thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

– sana ch
2 hours ago





thank you so much that's exactly what i'm searching for, i appreciate your help

– sana ch
2 hours ago











1














The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.



The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
Q &= Aw \
mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\
mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\
vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\
bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

    – sana ch
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

    – Mico
    4 hours ago








  • 1





    @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

    – egreg
    3 hours ago
















1














The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.



The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
Q &= Aw \
mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\
mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\
vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\
bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

    – sana ch
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

    – Mico
    4 hours ago








  • 1





    @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

    – egreg
    3 hours ago














1












1








1







The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.



The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
Q &= Aw \
mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\
mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\
vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\
bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer













The notational possibilities are sheer endless. Which notational practice you wish to adopt may be dictated by typographic conventions specific to a field, a language, a country, etc. LaTeX and TeX don't prescribe any particular notational practice.



The following screenshot shows five possibilities; I have no doubt that there are many more. Echoing a thought already expressed by David Carlisle, "blackboard-style" notational conventions (e.g., with one or two underlines) are not necessarily the best when applied to typeset, as opposed to hand-written, material.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,bm}
begin{document}

begin{align*}
Q &= Aw \
mathrm{Q} &= mathrm{A}mathrm{w}\
mathbf{Q} &= mathbf{A}mathbf{w}\
vec{Q} &= Avec{w}\
bm{Q} &= bm{A}bm{w}
end{align*}
end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









MicoMico

287k32392781




287k32392781








  • 1





    thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

    – sana ch
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

    – Mico
    4 hours ago








  • 1





    @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

    – egreg
    3 hours ago














  • 1





    thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

    – sana ch
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

    – Mico
    4 hours ago








  • 1





    @sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

    – egreg
    3 hours ago








1




1





thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

– sana ch
4 hours ago





thank you for your reply, i share the same opinion as you, i think it's a blaskboard notation but my supervisor insist to do it this way in my thesis

– sana ch
4 hours ago




1




1





@sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

– Mico
4 hours ago







@sanach - If your supervisor is so strongly wedded to this borderline unsuitable typographic convention, just show him the output of underline{Q}=underline{underline{A}},underline{w} and ask him for permission to use a different, non-disastrous notation for vectors and matrices. :-)

– Mico
4 hours ago






1




1





@sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

– egreg
3 hours ago





@sanach Explaining matrix multiplication in a thesis? That's what every sophomore should know!

– egreg
3 hours ago










sana ch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















sana ch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













sana ch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












sana ch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485372%2frepresentation-of-vector-and-matrix-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

Berlina muro

Berlina aerponto