Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.
There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?
sql-server index
add a comment |
I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.
There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?
sql-server index
add a comment |
I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.
There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?
sql-server index
I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.
There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?
sql-server index
sql-server index
asked 6 hours ago
BVernonBVernon
218413
218413
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:
Neither of them are marked as
UNIQUE
(in which case, preserve that one)Neither of them have a filter condition
Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:
Neither of them are marked as
UNIQUE
(in which case, preserve that one)Neither of them have a filter condition
Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:
Neither of them are marked as
UNIQUE
(in which case, preserve that one)Neither of them have a filter condition
Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:
Neither of them are marked as
UNIQUE
(in which case, preserve that one)Neither of them have a filter condition
Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint
Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:
Neither of them are marked as
UNIQUE
(in which case, preserve that one)Neither of them have a filter condition
Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint
answered 5 hours ago
Erik DarlingErik Darling
22.9k1269113
22.9k1269113
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)
– BVernon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown