Does this extra sentence in the description of the warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper eldritch invocation...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I signed up specifically to ask this question, because this website is one of the only places I have found this extra line of text in the warlock's "Eyes of the Rune Keeper" eldritch invocation from D&D 5e.
On a few posts here, I have seen Eyes of the Rune Keeper quoted as:
You can read all writing. You can comprehend any written word or symbol, should it hold any linguistic meaning
Specifically here: Can Warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper decipher written code?
and here: What would a Warlock understand from written spells outside of their class, via Eyes of the Rune Keeper?
I haven't been able to find this specific description for the invocation in any official documentation; I've looked through the PHB, both versions of the released errata for the PHB, XGE (most of the official reference books), scoured through Sage Advice, and I can only find one other non-official reference to the extra line of text over at the DND5E Fandom wiki.
Is there any official reference document that contains the second sentence in the above quote? Or is the following sentence the only official description of the ability?
You can read all writing.
dnd-5e warlock eldritch-invocations
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I signed up specifically to ask this question, because this website is one of the only places I have found this extra line of text in the warlock's "Eyes of the Rune Keeper" eldritch invocation from D&D 5e.
On a few posts here, I have seen Eyes of the Rune Keeper quoted as:
You can read all writing. You can comprehend any written word or symbol, should it hold any linguistic meaning
Specifically here: Can Warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper decipher written code?
and here: What would a Warlock understand from written spells outside of their class, via Eyes of the Rune Keeper?
I haven't been able to find this specific description for the invocation in any official documentation; I've looked through the PHB, both versions of the released errata for the PHB, XGE (most of the official reference books), scoured through Sage Advice, and I can only find one other non-official reference to the extra line of text over at the DND5E Fandom wiki.
Is there any official reference document that contains the second sentence in the above quote? Or is the following sentence the only official description of the ability?
You can read all writing.
dnd-5e warlock eldritch-invocations
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
17 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I signed up specifically to ask this question, because this website is one of the only places I have found this extra line of text in the warlock's "Eyes of the Rune Keeper" eldritch invocation from D&D 5e.
On a few posts here, I have seen Eyes of the Rune Keeper quoted as:
You can read all writing. You can comprehend any written word or symbol, should it hold any linguistic meaning
Specifically here: Can Warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper decipher written code?
and here: What would a Warlock understand from written spells outside of their class, via Eyes of the Rune Keeper?
I haven't been able to find this specific description for the invocation in any official documentation; I've looked through the PHB, both versions of the released errata for the PHB, XGE (most of the official reference books), scoured through Sage Advice, and I can only find one other non-official reference to the extra line of text over at the DND5E Fandom wiki.
Is there any official reference document that contains the second sentence in the above quote? Or is the following sentence the only official description of the ability?
You can read all writing.
dnd-5e warlock eldritch-invocations
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I signed up specifically to ask this question, because this website is one of the only places I have found this extra line of text in the warlock's "Eyes of the Rune Keeper" eldritch invocation from D&D 5e.
On a few posts here, I have seen Eyes of the Rune Keeper quoted as:
You can read all writing. You can comprehend any written word or symbol, should it hold any linguistic meaning
Specifically here: Can Warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper decipher written code?
and here: What would a Warlock understand from written spells outside of their class, via Eyes of the Rune Keeper?
I haven't been able to find this specific description for the invocation in any official documentation; I've looked through the PHB, both versions of the released errata for the PHB, XGE (most of the official reference books), scoured through Sage Advice, and I can only find one other non-official reference to the extra line of text over at the DND5E Fandom wiki.
Is there any official reference document that contains the second sentence in the above quote? Or is the following sentence the only official description of the ability?
You can read all writing.
dnd-5e warlock eldritch-invocations
dnd-5e warlock eldritch-invocations
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
edited 18 mins ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
28.1k5101171
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
asked 1 hour ago
SeidrSeidr
417
417
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Seidr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
17 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
17 mins ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
17 mins ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
17 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the Sage Advice Compendium pdf I found:
Does the Eyes of the Rune Keeper invocation work on magical runes? Eyes of the Rune Keeper lets you read any form of writing, including the linguistic meaning of a rune, if any.
So I believe that fandom.com (not really known for their validity) took it upon themselves to update the description with some Sage Advice text.
Then people starting using fandom.com as a "source of truth". It's becoming more common for posters here to directly link to DnD Beyond which keeps their info up to date and correct.
So you are correct, the only legit description is:
You can read all writing.
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's not the official text.
As you've pointed out, that extra line is not in the PHB, or licensed published material. It's also not in the D&DBeyond page for the Warlock class, which is up to date with errata, and that site is considered a more reliable source than the unofficial D&D wikias.
The unofficial wikia seems to have adapted the text from the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium (publicly available on WOTC's website), or possibly from the original tweet from game designer Jeremy Crawford, and added that text into their entry for Eyes of the Rune Keeper.
Apparently some users on this site have copypasted the combined text from the unofficial wikia, or perhaps they copied each other.
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Seidr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147034%2fdoes-this-extra-sentence-in-the-description-of-the-warlocks-eyes-of-the-rune-ke%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the Sage Advice Compendium pdf I found:
Does the Eyes of the Rune Keeper invocation work on magical runes? Eyes of the Rune Keeper lets you read any form of writing, including the linguistic meaning of a rune, if any.
So I believe that fandom.com (not really known for their validity) took it upon themselves to update the description with some Sage Advice text.
Then people starting using fandom.com as a "source of truth". It's becoming more common for posters here to directly link to DnD Beyond which keeps their info up to date and correct.
So you are correct, the only legit description is:
You can read all writing.
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the Sage Advice Compendium pdf I found:
Does the Eyes of the Rune Keeper invocation work on magical runes? Eyes of the Rune Keeper lets you read any form of writing, including the linguistic meaning of a rune, if any.
So I believe that fandom.com (not really known for their validity) took it upon themselves to update the description with some Sage Advice text.
Then people starting using fandom.com as a "source of truth". It's becoming more common for posters here to directly link to DnD Beyond which keeps their info up to date and correct.
So you are correct, the only legit description is:
You can read all writing.
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the Sage Advice Compendium pdf I found:
Does the Eyes of the Rune Keeper invocation work on magical runes? Eyes of the Rune Keeper lets you read any form of writing, including the linguistic meaning of a rune, if any.
So I believe that fandom.com (not really known for their validity) took it upon themselves to update the description with some Sage Advice text.
Then people starting using fandom.com as a "source of truth". It's becoming more common for posters here to directly link to DnD Beyond which keeps their info up to date and correct.
So you are correct, the only legit description is:
You can read all writing.
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
$endgroup$
In the Sage Advice Compendium pdf I found:
Does the Eyes of the Rune Keeper invocation work on magical runes? Eyes of the Rune Keeper lets you read any form of writing, including the linguistic meaning of a rune, if any.
So I believe that fandom.com (not really known for their validity) took it upon themselves to update the description with some Sage Advice text.
Then people starting using fandom.com as a "source of truth". It's becoming more common for posters here to directly link to DnD Beyond which keeps their info up to date and correct.
So you are correct, the only legit description is:
You can read all writing.
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
answered 1 hour ago
MivaScottMivaScott
7,19711648
7,19711648
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This is what I thought might be the case since I found that on Sage Advice, but wasn't sure if there was something official that I had missed that included the extra line. Thank you so much for your time.
$endgroup$
– Seidr
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's not the official text.
As you've pointed out, that extra line is not in the PHB, or licensed published material. It's also not in the D&DBeyond page for the Warlock class, which is up to date with errata, and that site is considered a more reliable source than the unofficial D&D wikias.
The unofficial wikia seems to have adapted the text from the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium (publicly available on WOTC's website), or possibly from the original tweet from game designer Jeremy Crawford, and added that text into their entry for Eyes of the Rune Keeper.
Apparently some users on this site have copypasted the combined text from the unofficial wikia, or perhaps they copied each other.
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's not the official text.
As you've pointed out, that extra line is not in the PHB, or licensed published material. It's also not in the D&DBeyond page for the Warlock class, which is up to date with errata, and that site is considered a more reliable source than the unofficial D&D wikias.
The unofficial wikia seems to have adapted the text from the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium (publicly available on WOTC's website), or possibly from the original tweet from game designer Jeremy Crawford, and added that text into their entry for Eyes of the Rune Keeper.
Apparently some users on this site have copypasted the combined text from the unofficial wikia, or perhaps they copied each other.
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's not the official text.
As you've pointed out, that extra line is not in the PHB, or licensed published material. It's also not in the D&DBeyond page for the Warlock class, which is up to date with errata, and that site is considered a more reliable source than the unofficial D&D wikias.
The unofficial wikia seems to have adapted the text from the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium (publicly available on WOTC's website), or possibly from the original tweet from game designer Jeremy Crawford, and added that text into their entry for Eyes of the Rune Keeper.
Apparently some users on this site have copypasted the combined text from the unofficial wikia, or perhaps they copied each other.
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
$endgroup$
That's not the official text.
As you've pointed out, that extra line is not in the PHB, or licensed published material. It's also not in the D&DBeyond page for the Warlock class, which is up to date with errata, and that site is considered a more reliable source than the unofficial D&D wikias.
The unofficial wikia seems to have adapted the text from the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium (publicly available on WOTC's website), or possibly from the original tweet from game designer Jeremy Crawford, and added that text into their entry for Eyes of the Rune Keeper.
Apparently some users on this site have copypasted the combined text from the unofficial wikia, or perhaps they copied each other.
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
answered 1 hour ago
MikeQMikeQ
15k63388
15k63388
add a comment |
add a comment |
Seidr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Seidr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Seidr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Seidr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147034%2fdoes-this-extra-sentence-in-the-description-of-the-warlocks-eyes-of-the-rune-ke%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
17 mins ago