Converting Functions to Arrow functions












6















I'm learning ES6, I just want to convert my ES5 knowledge to ES6.



here's my ES5 code:



function click() {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
};


and here's my ES6 code:



const click = () => {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
console.log('RENDERING');
}


My problem is this.className += ' grab'; and setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0); didn't run the function. But console.log shows on the log.




Is this method don't work on arrow functions?











share|improve this question







New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    this is not a method, and is different inside an arrow function - read documentation to understand the difference ... didn't run the function yes, it did, you just don't know what you're doing yet

    – Jaromanda X
    2 hours ago








  • 2





    this keyword functions differently in arrow functions. Read this section of the documentation.

    – Yong Quan
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Aside - Consider using el.classList.add('grab') (and el.classList.remove('grab')) instead of manipulating the string of class names manually. more info

    – James
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This shows that not all functions should be converted to arrow functions just because arrow functions are cool :p arrow functions serve a specific purpose and should only be used as appropriate

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of What does "this" refer to in arrow functions in ES6?

    – adiga
    1 hour ago
















6















I'm learning ES6, I just want to convert my ES5 knowledge to ES6.



here's my ES5 code:



function click() {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
};


and here's my ES6 code:



const click = () => {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
console.log('RENDERING');
}


My problem is this.className += ' grab'; and setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0); didn't run the function. But console.log shows on the log.




Is this method don't work on arrow functions?











share|improve this question







New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    this is not a method, and is different inside an arrow function - read documentation to understand the difference ... didn't run the function yes, it did, you just don't know what you're doing yet

    – Jaromanda X
    2 hours ago








  • 2





    this keyword functions differently in arrow functions. Read this section of the documentation.

    – Yong Quan
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Aside - Consider using el.classList.add('grab') (and el.classList.remove('grab')) instead of manipulating the string of class names manually. more info

    – James
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This shows that not all functions should be converted to arrow functions just because arrow functions are cool :p arrow functions serve a specific purpose and should only be used as appropriate

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of What does "this" refer to in arrow functions in ES6?

    – adiga
    1 hour ago














6












6








6








I'm learning ES6, I just want to convert my ES5 knowledge to ES6.



here's my ES5 code:



function click() {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
};


and here's my ES6 code:



const click = () => {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
console.log('RENDERING');
}


My problem is this.className += ' grab'; and setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0); didn't run the function. But console.log shows on the log.




Is this method don't work on arrow functions?











share|improve this question







New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I'm learning ES6, I just want to convert my ES5 knowledge to ES6.



here's my ES5 code:



function click() {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
};


and here's my ES6 code:



const click = () => {
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
console.log('RENDERING');
}


My problem is this.className += ' grab'; and setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0); didn't run the function. But console.log shows on the log.




Is this method don't work on arrow functions?








javascript function arrow-functions






share|improve this question







New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









code for moneycode for money

332




332




New contributor




code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






code for money is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    this is not a method, and is different inside an arrow function - read documentation to understand the difference ... didn't run the function yes, it did, you just don't know what you're doing yet

    – Jaromanda X
    2 hours ago








  • 2





    this keyword functions differently in arrow functions. Read this section of the documentation.

    – Yong Quan
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Aside - Consider using el.classList.add('grab') (and el.classList.remove('grab')) instead of manipulating the string of class names manually. more info

    – James
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This shows that not all functions should be converted to arrow functions just because arrow functions are cool :p arrow functions serve a specific purpose and should only be used as appropriate

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of What does "this" refer to in arrow functions in ES6?

    – adiga
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    this is not a method, and is different inside an arrow function - read documentation to understand the difference ... didn't run the function yes, it did, you just don't know what you're doing yet

    – Jaromanda X
    2 hours ago








  • 2





    this keyword functions differently in arrow functions. Read this section of the documentation.

    – Yong Quan
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    Aside - Consider using el.classList.add('grab') (and el.classList.remove('grab')) instead of manipulating the string of class names manually. more info

    – James
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This shows that not all functions should be converted to arrow functions just because arrow functions are cool :p arrow functions serve a specific purpose and should only be used as appropriate

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago











  • Possible duplicate of What does "this" refer to in arrow functions in ES6?

    – adiga
    1 hour ago








1




1





this is not a method, and is different inside an arrow function - read documentation to understand the difference ... didn't run the function yes, it did, you just don't know what you're doing yet

– Jaromanda X
2 hours ago







this is not a method, and is different inside an arrow function - read documentation to understand the difference ... didn't run the function yes, it did, you just don't know what you're doing yet

– Jaromanda X
2 hours ago






2




2





this keyword functions differently in arrow functions. Read this section of the documentation.

– Yong Quan
2 hours ago





this keyword functions differently in arrow functions. Read this section of the documentation.

– Yong Quan
2 hours ago




2




2





Aside - Consider using el.classList.add('grab') (and el.classList.remove('grab')) instead of manipulating the string of class names manually. more info

– James
1 hour ago





Aside - Consider using el.classList.add('grab') (and el.classList.remove('grab')) instead of manipulating the string of class names manually. more info

– James
1 hour ago




1




1





This shows that not all functions should be converted to arrow functions just because arrow functions are cool :p arrow functions serve a specific purpose and should only be used as appropriate

– Jaromanda X
1 hour ago





This shows that not all functions should be converted to arrow functions just because arrow functions are cool :p arrow functions serve a specific purpose and should only be used as appropriate

– Jaromanda X
1 hour ago













Possible duplicate of What does "this" refer to in arrow functions in ES6?

– adiga
1 hour ago





Possible duplicate of What does "this" refer to in arrow functions in ES6?

– adiga
1 hour ago












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















4














There's not really enough context to give you a good answer, but one thing stands out. Arrow functions maintain scope, so this inside function click() and const click may well be different. In the ES6 version, this will refer to whatever was this during the closure creation, which may not be what you want.



Arrow Functions at MDN clears it up:




An arrow function does not have its own this.




…Which means that this will be inherited from the declaring scope.



ES6 arrow functions aren't just a new way of declaring functions, and there's nothing inherently wrong with function myFunction(...) syntax, nor is it going away. Arrow functions avoid some verbosity when passing a function as an argument (e.g. to forEach) and avoid the need to rebind a function to a different this in some cases. Converting all function declarations to arrow syntax is not an upgrade.






share|improve this answer


























  • @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

    – adc
    1 hour ago



















0














The reason is that you just need to slightly restructure things.



setTimeout(() => {this.className = 'remove'}, 0)


You have parenthesis vs curly braces.



your this may or may not work depending on how things are structured in the other code






share|improve this answer


























  • absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago



















0














In Arrow Functions, this isn't the this you would expect. this in Arrow Functions is defined when you create the function - not when it is called. See here for more information on that.



Thanks to @Jaromanda X from the comments - In this case, keep using standard function notation (function() {...}) - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago











  • @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

    – Aniket G
    1 hour ago











  • keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago













  • @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

    – Aniket G
    1 hour ago











  • Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

    – Jaromanda X
    1 hour ago



















0














       const click = () => {
console.log(this);
this.className += ' grab';
setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
console.log('RENDERING');
}
click();


'this' in the arrow function represents from wherever it is called. for eg if i open the browser and goto console and type above code then 'this' will become window object since the function is called from global enviroment. Also arrow function doesnot have its own 'this'.






share|improve this answer































    0














    You can bind this for arrow function to access functions and data. Your code should be something like



    const click = () => {
    this.className += ' grab';
    setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
    console.log('RENDERING');
    }.bind(this)


    It will bind this for arrow function and you can access those variable and functions.






    share|improve this answer
























    • it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

      – somebody
      5 mins ago





















    0














    An arrow function expression is a syntactically compact alternative to a regular function expression, although without its own bindings to the this, arguments, super, or new.target keywords. Arrow function expressions are ill suited as methods, and they cannot be used as constructors.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      code for money is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55175428%2fconverting-functions-to-arrow-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      There's not really enough context to give you a good answer, but one thing stands out. Arrow functions maintain scope, so this inside function click() and const click may well be different. In the ES6 version, this will refer to whatever was this during the closure creation, which may not be what you want.



      Arrow Functions at MDN clears it up:




      An arrow function does not have its own this.




      …Which means that this will be inherited from the declaring scope.



      ES6 arrow functions aren't just a new way of declaring functions, and there's nothing inherently wrong with function myFunction(...) syntax, nor is it going away. Arrow functions avoid some verbosity when passing a function as an argument (e.g. to forEach) and avoid the need to rebind a function to a different this in some cases. Converting all function declarations to arrow syntax is not an upgrade.






      share|improve this answer


























      • @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

        – adc
        1 hour ago
















      4














      There's not really enough context to give you a good answer, but one thing stands out. Arrow functions maintain scope, so this inside function click() and const click may well be different. In the ES6 version, this will refer to whatever was this during the closure creation, which may not be what you want.



      Arrow Functions at MDN clears it up:




      An arrow function does not have its own this.




      …Which means that this will be inherited from the declaring scope.



      ES6 arrow functions aren't just a new way of declaring functions, and there's nothing inherently wrong with function myFunction(...) syntax, nor is it going away. Arrow functions avoid some verbosity when passing a function as an argument (e.g. to forEach) and avoid the need to rebind a function to a different this in some cases. Converting all function declarations to arrow syntax is not an upgrade.






      share|improve this answer


























      • @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

        – adc
        1 hour ago














      4












      4








      4







      There's not really enough context to give you a good answer, but one thing stands out. Arrow functions maintain scope, so this inside function click() and const click may well be different. In the ES6 version, this will refer to whatever was this during the closure creation, which may not be what you want.



      Arrow Functions at MDN clears it up:




      An arrow function does not have its own this.




      …Which means that this will be inherited from the declaring scope.



      ES6 arrow functions aren't just a new way of declaring functions, and there's nothing inherently wrong with function myFunction(...) syntax, nor is it going away. Arrow functions avoid some verbosity when passing a function as an argument (e.g. to forEach) and avoid the need to rebind a function to a different this in some cases. Converting all function declarations to arrow syntax is not an upgrade.






      share|improve this answer















      There's not really enough context to give you a good answer, but one thing stands out. Arrow functions maintain scope, so this inside function click() and const click may well be different. In the ES6 version, this will refer to whatever was this during the closure creation, which may not be what you want.



      Arrow Functions at MDN clears it up:




      An arrow function does not have its own this.




      …Which means that this will be inherited from the declaring scope.



      ES6 arrow functions aren't just a new way of declaring functions, and there's nothing inherently wrong with function myFunction(...) syntax, nor is it going away. Arrow functions avoid some verbosity when passing a function as an argument (e.g. to forEach) and avoid the need to rebind a function to a different this in some cases. Converting all function declarations to arrow syntax is not an upgrade.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 2 hours ago









      adcadc

      18116




      18116













      • @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

        – adc
        1 hour ago



















      • @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

        – adc
        1 hour ago

















      @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

      – adc
      1 hour ago





      @jaromanda-x Yeah, you're probably right, especially if you assume that the function is normally called as an object method, which is why it would even have a className property. Shrug.

      – adc
      1 hour ago













      0














      The reason is that you just need to slightly restructure things.



      setTimeout(() => {this.className = 'remove'}, 0)


      You have parenthesis vs curly braces.



      your this may or may not work depending on how things are structured in the other code






      share|improve this answer


























      • absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago
















      0














      The reason is that you just need to slightly restructure things.



      setTimeout(() => {this.className = 'remove'}, 0)


      You have parenthesis vs curly braces.



      your this may or may not work depending on how things are structured in the other code






      share|improve this answer


























      • absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago














      0












      0








      0







      The reason is that you just need to slightly restructure things.



      setTimeout(() => {this.className = 'remove'}, 0)


      You have parenthesis vs curly braces.



      your this may or may not work depending on how things are structured in the other code






      share|improve this answer















      The reason is that you just need to slightly restructure things.



      setTimeout(() => {this.className = 'remove'}, 0)


      You have parenthesis vs curly braces.



      your this may or may not work depending on how things are structured in the other code







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      Jon BlackJon Black

      860718




      860718













      • absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago



















      • absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago

















      absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago





      absolutely no difference in this context - in other context, the difference is what the arrow function returns

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago











      0














      In Arrow Functions, this isn't the this you would expect. this in Arrow Functions is defined when you create the function - not when it is called. See here for more information on that.



      Thanks to @Jaromanda X from the comments - In this case, keep using standard function notation (function() {...}) - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago











      • @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago













      • @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago
















      0














      In Arrow Functions, this isn't the this you would expect. this in Arrow Functions is defined when you create the function - not when it is called. See here for more information on that.



      Thanks to @Jaromanda X from the comments - In this case, keep using standard function notation (function() {...}) - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago











      • @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago













      • @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago














      0












      0








      0







      In Arrow Functions, this isn't the this you would expect. this in Arrow Functions is defined when you create the function - not when it is called. See here for more information on that.



      Thanks to @Jaromanda X from the comments - In this case, keep using standard function notation (function() {...}) - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails






      share|improve this answer















      In Arrow Functions, this isn't the this you would expect. this in Arrow Functions is defined when you create the function - not when it is called. See here for more information on that.



      Thanks to @Jaromanda X from the comments - In this case, keep using standard function notation (function() {...}) - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      Aniket GAniket G

      2,182226




      2,182226








      • 1





        this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago











      • @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago













      • @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago














      • 1





        this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago











      • @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago













      • @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

        – Aniket G
        1 hour ago











      • Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

        – Jaromanda X
        1 hour ago








      1




      1





      this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago





      this does exist, otherwise the OP would get errors - this is from the bounding lexical scope

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago













      @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

      – Aniket G
      1 hour ago





      @JaromandaX you're right. let me fix that

      – Aniket G
      1 hour ago













      keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago







      keep using standard function notation - i.e. just because you bought a new screwdriver, doesn't mean the old hammer isn't still the best tool for banging in nails

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago















      @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

      – Aniket G
      1 hour ago





      @JaromandaX that's actually a very good analogy. Do you mind if I put that in my answer?

      – Aniket G
      1 hour ago













      Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago





      Feel free - it's one of my better ones :p

      – Jaromanda X
      1 hour ago











      0














             const click = () => {
      console.log(this);
      this.className += ' grab';
      setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
      console.log('RENDERING');
      }
      click();


      'this' in the arrow function represents from wherever it is called. for eg if i open the browser and goto console and type above code then 'this' will become window object since the function is called from global enviroment. Also arrow function doesnot have its own 'this'.






      share|improve this answer




























        0














               const click = () => {
        console.log(this);
        this.className += ' grab';
        setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
        console.log('RENDERING');
        }
        click();


        'this' in the arrow function represents from wherever it is called. for eg if i open the browser and goto console and type above code then 'this' will become window object since the function is called from global enviroment. Also arrow function doesnot have its own 'this'.






        share|improve this answer


























          0












          0








          0







                 const click = () => {
          console.log(this);
          this.className += ' grab';
          setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
          console.log('RENDERING');
          }
          click();


          'this' in the arrow function represents from wherever it is called. for eg if i open the browser and goto console and type above code then 'this' will become window object since the function is called from global enviroment. Also arrow function doesnot have its own 'this'.






          share|improve this answer













                 const click = () => {
          console.log(this);
          this.className += ' grab';
          setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
          console.log('RENDERING');
          }
          click();


          'this' in the arrow function represents from wherever it is called. for eg if i open the browser and goto console and type above code then 'this' will become window object since the function is called from global enviroment. Also arrow function doesnot have its own 'this'.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Kaushal RegmiKaushal Regmi

          538




          538























              0














              You can bind this for arrow function to access functions and data. Your code should be something like



              const click = () => {
              this.className += ' grab';
              setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
              console.log('RENDERING');
              }.bind(this)


              It will bind this for arrow function and you can access those variable and functions.






              share|improve this answer
























              • it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

                – somebody
                5 mins ago


















              0














              You can bind this for arrow function to access functions and data. Your code should be something like



              const click = () => {
              this.className += ' grab';
              setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
              console.log('RENDERING');
              }.bind(this)


              It will bind this for arrow function and you can access those variable and functions.






              share|improve this answer
























              • it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

                – somebody
                5 mins ago
















              0












              0








              0







              You can bind this for arrow function to access functions and data. Your code should be something like



              const click = () => {
              this.className += ' grab';
              setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
              console.log('RENDERING');
              }.bind(this)


              It will bind this for arrow function and you can access those variable and functions.






              share|improve this answer













              You can bind this for arrow function to access functions and data. Your code should be something like



              const click = () => {
              this.className += ' grab';
              setTimeout(() => (this.className = 'remove'), 0);
              console.log('RENDERING');
              }.bind(this)


              It will bind this for arrow function and you can access those variable and functions.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 1 hour ago









              ZearaeZZearaeZ

              710418




              710418













              • it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

                – somebody
                5 mins ago





















              • it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

                – somebody
                5 mins ago



















              it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

              – somebody
              5 mins ago







              it will bind this only if it's defined in the object though

              – somebody
              5 mins ago













              0














              An arrow function expression is a syntactically compact alternative to a regular function expression, although without its own bindings to the this, arguments, super, or new.target keywords. Arrow function expressions are ill suited as methods, and they cannot be used as constructors.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                An arrow function expression is a syntactically compact alternative to a regular function expression, although without its own bindings to the this, arguments, super, or new.target keywords. Arrow function expressions are ill suited as methods, and they cannot be used as constructors.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  An arrow function expression is a syntactically compact alternative to a regular function expression, although without its own bindings to the this, arguments, super, or new.target keywords. Arrow function expressions are ill suited as methods, and they cannot be used as constructors.






                  share|improve this answer













                  An arrow function expression is a syntactically compact alternative to a regular function expression, although without its own bindings to the this, arguments, super, or new.target keywords. Arrow function expressions are ill suited as methods, and they cannot be used as constructors.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Bathri NathanBathri Nathan

                  937




                  937






















                      code for money is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      code for money is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      code for money is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      code for money is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55175428%2fconverting-functions-to-arrow-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                      Berlina muro

                      Berlina aerponto