When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?












2















When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



Here's are a few examples:




This is an Xbox-compatible game.



This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






hyphens







share|improve this question





























    2















    When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



    Here's are a few examples:




    This is an Xbox-compatible game.



    This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



    This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




    More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






    hyphens







    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



      Here's are a few examples:




      This is an Xbox-compatible game.



      This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



      This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




      More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






      hyphens







      share|improve this question
















      When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



      Here's are a few examples:




      This is an Xbox-compatible game.



      This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



      This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




      More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






      hyphens




      hyphens






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 15 mins ago









      Jasper

      18.3k43670




      18.3k43670










      asked 1 hour ago









      repomonsterrepomonster

      1,005116




      1,005116






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



          Consider:




          John was a white bearded man.




          Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




          John was a white-bearded man.




          This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

            – repomonster
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

            – Robusto
            1 hour ago











          • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

            – Jasper
            13 mins ago



















          2














          Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



          You asked:




          Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




          Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



          Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



          Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



          But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




          The white, bearded man.




          and




          The white-bearded man.




          It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200601%2fwhen-do-we-add-an-hyphen-to-a-complex-adjective-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              13 mins ago
















            4














            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              13 mins ago














            4












            4








            4







            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






            share|improve this answer















            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            RobustoRobusto

            11.9k22941




            11.9k22941








            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              13 mins ago














            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              13 mins ago








            1




            1





            So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

            – repomonster
            1 hour ago





            So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

            – repomonster
            1 hour ago




            1




            1





            Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

            – Robusto
            1 hour ago





            Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

            – Robusto
            1 hour ago













            "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

            – Jasper
            13 mins ago





            "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

            – Jasper
            13 mins ago













            2














            Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



            You asked:




            Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




            Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



            Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



            Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



            But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




            The white, bearded man.




            and




            The white-bearded man.




            It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



              You asked:




              Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




              Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



              Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



              Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



              But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




              The white, bearded man.




              and




              The white-bearded man.




              It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2







                Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



                You asked:




                Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




                Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



                Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



                Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



                But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




                The white, bearded man.




                and




                The white-bearded man.




                It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






                share|improve this answer













                Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



                You asked:




                Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




                Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



                Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



                Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



                But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




                The white, bearded man.




                and




                The white-bearded man.




                It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 48 mins ago









                fred2fred2

                2,867718




                2,867718






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200601%2fwhen-do-we-add-an-hyphen-to-a-complex-adjective-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                    Image
                    .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75
                    Read more

                    Berlina muro

                    Image
                    La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l
                    Read more

                    Berlina aerponto

                    Image
                    Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa
                    Read more