Chktex complains about “no italic correction found”, how to fix this?
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle?
Funnily, using {slshape/} mutes chktex, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
add a comment |
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle?
Funnily, using {slshape/} mutes chktex, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keepchktexhappy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.
– moewe
3 hours ago
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding% chktex 6after the{slshape}(haven't tested that).
– moewe
3 hours ago
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
I'm not even sure whychktexexamines things in the preamble.
– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle?
Funnily, using {slshape/} mutes chktex, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle?
Funnily, using {slshape/} mutes chktex, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
asked 3 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1629
1629
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keepchktexhappy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.
– moewe
3 hours ago
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding% chktex 6after the{slshape}(haven't tested that).
– moewe
3 hours ago
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
I'm not even sure whychktexexamines things in the preamble.
– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keepchktexhappy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.
– moewe
3 hours ago
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding% chktex 6after the{slshape}(haven't tested that).
– moewe
3 hours ago
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
I'm not even sure whychktexexamines things in the preamble.
– egreg
1 hour ago
1
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keep
chktex happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.– moewe
3 hours ago
I guess in that case you just don't want to keep
chktex happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.– moewe
3 hours ago
1
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding
% chktex 6 after the {slshape} (haven't tested that).– moewe
3 hours ago
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding
% chktex 6 after the {slshape} (haven't tested that).– moewe
3 hours ago
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
I'm not even sure why
chktex examines things in the preamble.– egreg
1 hour ago
I'm not even sure why
chktex examines things in the preamble.– egreg
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add / directly after slshape here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor). Here the {slshape} is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6 in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...} macros instead of their switches (textit–itshape etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6 command line option or chktexrc config file).
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469942%2fchktex-complains-about-no-italic-correction-found-how-to-fix-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add / directly after slshape here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor). Here the {slshape} is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6 in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...} macros instead of their switches (textit–itshape etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6 command line option or chktexrc config file).
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
add a comment |
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add / directly after slshape here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor). Here the {slshape} is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6 in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...} macros instead of their switches (textit–itshape etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6 command line option or chktexrc config file).
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
add a comment |
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add / directly after slshape here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor). Here the {slshape} is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6 in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...} macros instead of their switches (textit–itshape etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6 command line option or chktexrc config file).
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add / directly after slshape here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor). Here the {slshape} is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6 in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...} macros instead of their switches (textit–itshape etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6 command line option or chktexrc config file).
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
answered 1 hour ago
moewemoewe
87.7k9110335
87.7k9110335
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469942%2fchktex-complains-about-no-italic-correction-found-how-to-fix-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keep
chktexhappy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.– moewe
3 hours ago
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding
% chktex 6after the{slshape}(haven't tested that).– moewe
3 hours ago
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
I'm not even sure why
chktexexamines things in the preamble.– egreg
1 hour ago