Free operad over a monoid object
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{O}$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcal{O}(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcal{O}(1)otimes mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcal{O}(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcal{O}to mathcal{O}'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrm{Operads}(M)to mathrm{Monoids}(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcal{O}_T(r) := T^{otimes r}.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^{otimes r}otimes bigotimes_{i=1}^r T^{otimes k_i}to T^{otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)}$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^{otimes k}$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^{otimes k}stackrel{Deltaotimes mathrm{id}}{to}T^{otimes k}otimes T^{otimes k} cong (T^{otimes 2})^{otimes k} to T^{otimes k}.$$
In $mathbf{Set}$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:
- Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
$$Tcong Totimes 1^{otimes (k-1)}stackrel{mathrm{id}otimes eta^{otimes (k-1)}}{to} T^{otimes k}.$$
- Obviously $mathcal{O}_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcal{O}_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?
ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{O}$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcal{O}(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcal{O}(1)otimes mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcal{O}(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcal{O}to mathcal{O}'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrm{Operads}(M)to mathrm{Monoids}(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcal{O}_T(r) := T^{otimes r}.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^{otimes r}otimes bigotimes_{i=1}^r T^{otimes k_i}to T^{otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)}$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^{otimes k}$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^{otimes k}stackrel{Deltaotimes mathrm{id}}{to}T^{otimes k}otimes T^{otimes k} cong (T^{otimes 2})^{otimes k} to T^{otimes k}.$$
In $mathbf{Set}$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:
- Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
$$Tcong Totimes 1^{otimes (k-1)}stackrel{mathrm{id}otimes eta^{otimes (k-1)}}{to} T^{otimes k}.$$
- Obviously $mathcal{O}_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcal{O}_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?
ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcal{O}(1)=T$ and all the $mathcal{O}(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcal{O}(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathcal{O}$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcal{O}(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcal{O}(1)otimes mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcal{O}(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcal{O}to mathcal{O}'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrm{Operads}(M)to mathrm{Monoids}(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcal{O}_T(r) := T^{otimes r}.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^{otimes r}otimes bigotimes_{i=1}^r T^{otimes k_i}to T^{otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)}$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^{otimes k}$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^{otimes k}stackrel{Deltaotimes mathrm{id}}{to}T^{otimes k}otimes T^{otimes k} cong (T^{otimes 2})^{otimes k} to T^{otimes k}.$$
In $mathbf{Set}$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:
- Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
$$Tcong Totimes 1^{otimes (k-1)}stackrel{mathrm{id}otimes eta^{otimes (k-1)}}{to} T^{otimes k}.$$
- Obviously $mathcal{O}_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcal{O}_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?
ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads
$endgroup$
Let $mathcal{O}$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcal{O}(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcal{O}(1)otimes mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcal{O}(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcal{O}to mathcal{O}'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcal{O}(1)to mathcal{O}(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrm{Operads}(M)to mathrm{Monoids}(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcal{O}_T(r) := T^{otimes r}.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^{otimes r}otimes bigotimes_{i=1}^r T^{otimes k_i}to T^{otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)}$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^{otimes k}$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^{otimes k}stackrel{Deltaotimes mathrm{id}}{to}T^{otimes k}otimes T^{otimes k} cong (T^{otimes 2})^{otimes k} to T^{otimes k}.$$
In $mathbf{Set}$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:
- Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
$$Tcong Totimes 1^{otimes (k-1)}stackrel{mathrm{id}otimes eta^{otimes (k-1)}}{to} T^{otimes k}.$$
- Obviously $mathcal{O}_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcal{O}_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?
ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads
ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads
asked 12 hours ago
FKranholdFKranhold
3627
3627
5
$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcal{O}(1)=T$ and all the $mathcal{O}(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcal{O}(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
11 hours ago
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcal{O}(1)=T$ and all the $mathcal{O}(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcal{O}(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
11 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcal{O}(1)=T$ and all the $mathcal{O}(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcal{O}(1)=T$ and all the $mathcal{O}(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcal{O}(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcal{O}(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
12 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
11 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathtt{Com} rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathtt{Com}$ by $T$.
No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.
I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathtt{O}(1) = T$ and $mathtt{O}(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327871%2ffree-operad-over-a-monoid-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathtt{Com} rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathtt{Com}$ by $T$.
No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.
I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathtt{O}(1) = T$ and $mathtt{O}(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathtt{Com} rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathtt{Com}$ by $T$.
No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.
I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathtt{O}(1) = T$ and $mathtt{O}(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathtt{Com} rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathtt{Com}$ by $T$.
No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.
I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathtt{O}(1) = T$ and $mathtt{O}(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.
$endgroup$
Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathtt{Com} rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathtt{Com}$ by $T$.
No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.
I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathtt{O}(1) = T$ and $mathtt{O}(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
Najib IdrissiNajib Idrissi
2,18711127
2,18711127
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrm{id}otimes betaotimesmathrm{id})circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^{otimes 2}to T^{otimes 2}$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FKranhold Yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327871%2ffree-operad-over-a-monoid-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcal{O}(1)=T$ and all the $mathcal{O}(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcal{O}(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
12 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
11 hours ago