Quantum Toffoli gate equation
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.
Let $U_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ and $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_{2^m})=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_{2^m}+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| otimes I_{2^m}$$
$$ V_n^j(U_{2^m}) = U_{2^m} otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}( I_{2^m} otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
Can someone explain the equations that are given
and how does this special case be a Toffoli?
quantum-gate tensor-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.
Let $U_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ and $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_{2^m})=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_{2^m}+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| otimes I_{2^m}$$
$$ V_n^j(U_{2^m}) = U_{2^m} otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}( I_{2^m} otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
Can someone explain the equations that are given
and how does this special case be a Toffoli?
quantum-gate tensor-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.
Let $U_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ and $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_{2^m})=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_{2^m}+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| otimes I_{2^m}$$
$$ V_n^j(U_{2^m}) = U_{2^m} otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}( I_{2^m} otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
Can someone explain the equations that are given
and how does this special case be a Toffoli?
quantum-gate tensor-product
$endgroup$
I was reading a research article on quantum computing and didn't understand the tensor notations for the unitary operations. The article defined two controlled gates.
Let $U_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ unitary matrix, $I_{2^m}$ be a $2^m times 2^m$ identity matrix. Then, controlled gates $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ and $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ with $n$ control qubits and $m$ target qubits are defined by $$ C_n^j(U_{2^m})=(|jrangle langle j|) otimes U_{2^m}+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| otimes I_{2^m}$$
$$ V_n^j(U_{2^m}) = U_{2^m} otimes (|jrangle langle j|) + sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}( I_{2^m} otimes (|irangle langle i| ))$$
Then they say that $C_2^j(X)$ and $V_2^j(X) $are toffoli gates.
Can someone explain the equations that are given
and how does this special case be a Toffoli?
quantum-gate tensor-product
quantum-gate tensor-product
edited 9 hours ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,64141556
6,64141556
asked 14 hours ago
UpstartUpstart
1506
1506
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.
Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ applies unitary operation $U_{2^m}$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_{2^m}$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:
$$
C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
$$
Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
Hence
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle ~~text{if}~~ x=j$$
and
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~text{if}~~ xneq j.$$
Gate $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.
Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5899%2fquantum-toffoli-gate-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.
Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ applies unitary operation $U_{2^m}$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_{2^m}$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:
$$
C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
$$
Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
Hence
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle ~~text{if}~~ x=j$$
and
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~text{if}~~ xneq j.$$
Gate $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.
Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.
Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ applies unitary operation $U_{2^m}$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_{2^m}$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:
$$
C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
$$
Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
Hence
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle ~~text{if}~~ x=j$$
and
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~text{if}~~ xneq j.$$
Gate $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.
Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.
Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ applies unitary operation $U_{2^m}$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_{2^m}$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:
$$
C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
$$
Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
Hence
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle ~~text{if}~~ x=j$$
and
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~text{if}~~ xneq j.$$
Gate $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.
Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.
$endgroup$
Here $i$ and $j$ are bit strings of size $n$. Correspondingly, $|irangle$, $|jrangle$ are some basis vectors in $2^n$-dimensional space, that corresponds to $n$-qubit register.
Those controlled operations $C$ and $V$ act on $(n+m)$-qubit space. You can consider first $n$ qubits as control register and last $m$ qubits as target register. Now, $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ applies unitary operation $U_{2^m}$ on the target register if control register is in the state $|jrangle$ and applies $I_{2^m}$ (i.e. do nothing) otherwise. You can see this by applying $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$ on some vector $|xrangle|yrangle$ from the $(n+m)$-qubit space, where $x$ is some $n$-bit string:
$$
C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = (|jrangle langle j|xrangle) otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle+ sum_{i=0,i neq j}^{2^n-1}((|irangle langle i| x rangle) otimes |yrangle)
$$
Here $|irangle langle i|xrangle = 0$ if $xneq i$ and it equals $|irangle$ if $x=i$.
Hence
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = |jrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle + 0 = |xrangle otimes U_{2^m} |yrangle ~~text{if}~~ x=j$$
and
$$C_n^j(U_{2^m}) |xrangle|yrangle = 0 + |xrangle|yrangle = |xrangle|yrangle ~~text{if}~~ xneq j.$$
Gate $V_n^j(U_{2^m})$ is basically the same as $C_n^j(U_{2^m})$, though we consider first $m$ qubits as target and last $n$ qubits as control register in this case.
Now, if $j=11$ then $C_2^j(X)$ is exactly CCNOT gate on 3 qubits. Because we apply $X$ (i.e. negating the value) on the last qubit only if two first qubits are in $|11rangle$ state.
edited 12 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Danylo YDanylo Y
45116
45116
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$y$ is an m bit string ? hence $|y rangle$ lies in a$2^m$ dimensional hilbert space?
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, that is it.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
why is $langle i|xrangle=0$ if $xneq i$ i see that it is an inner product between them but how is it zero because two binary strings dot product can still be non zero if they are not equal
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
$langle a | b rangle = langle a_1 | b_1 rangle langle a_2 | b_2 rangle ... langle a_n | b_n rangle$. This is zero if $a_i neq b_i$ at least for some $i$.
$endgroup$
– Danylo Y
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
i read that is $= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+....+a_nb_n$
$endgroup$
– Upstart
11 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5899%2fquantum-toffoli-gate-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown