What's wrong with this bogus proof?












2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    2 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    2 hours ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification




discrete-mathematics proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









ShinobuIsMyWifeShinobuIsMyWife

313




313








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    2 hours ago
















  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    2 hours ago










5




5




$begingroup$
Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
$endgroup$
– Alex
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
$endgroup$
– Alex
2 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
$endgroup$
– Dean Young
2 hours ago






$begingroup$
Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
$endgroup$
– Dean Young
2 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

$$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




    • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


    • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
      $$
      ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
      $$
      This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



    In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144460%2fwhats-wrong-with-this-bogus-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          ArthurArthur

          117k7116200




          117k7116200























              2












              $begingroup$

              You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




              • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


              • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                $$
                ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                $$
                This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



              In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




                • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


                • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                  $$
                  ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                  $$
                  This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



                In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




                  • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


                  • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                    $$
                    ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                    $$
                    This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



                  In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




                  • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


                  • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                    $$
                    ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                    $$
                    This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



                  In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 1 hour ago









                  J. W. Tanner

                  3,0981320




                  3,0981320










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

                  128k1184184




                  128k1184184






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144460%2fwhats-wrong-with-this-bogus-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75 ...
                      Read more

                      Berlina muro

                      Image
                      La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l...
                      Read more

                      Berlina aerponto

                      Image
                      Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa...
                      Read more