Translation of 答えを知っている人はいませんでした












2















I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:




[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。




Which is translated as:




[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.




This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.



Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?






translation







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.

    – Aeon Akechi
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.

    – Felipe Oliveira
    2 hours ago
















2















I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:




[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。




Which is translated as:




[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.




This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.



Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?






translation







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.

    – Aeon Akechi
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.

    – Felipe Oliveira
    2 hours ago














2












2








2








I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:




[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。




Which is translated as:




[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.




This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.



Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?






translation







share|improve this question














I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:




[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。




Which is translated as:




[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.




This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.



Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?






translation




translation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









PrestoPresto

182




182








  • 1





    'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.

    – Aeon Akechi
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.

    – Felipe Oliveira
    2 hours ago














  • 1





    'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.

    – Aeon Akechi
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.

    – Felipe Oliveira
    2 hours ago








1




1





'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.

– Aeon Akechi
3 hours ago





'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.

– Aeon Akechi
3 hours ago




1




1





while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.

– Felipe Oliveira
2 hours ago





while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.

– Felipe Oliveira
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














"To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:




  1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent

  2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist


You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.





  • 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.

  • ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.




Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "257"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65928%2ftranslation-of-%25e7%25ad%2594%25e3%2581%2588%25e3%2582%2592%25e7%259f%25a5%25e3%2581%25a3%25e3%2581%25a6%25e3%2581%2584%25e3%2582%258b%25e4%25ba%25ba%25e3%2581%25af%25e3%2581%2584%25e3%2581%25be%25e3%2581%259b%25e3%2582%2593%25e3%2581%25a7%25e3%2581%2597%25e3%2581%259f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    "To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:




    1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent

    2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist


    You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.





    • 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.

    • ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.




    Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.






    share|improve this answer




























      3














      "To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:




      1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent

      2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist


      You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.





      • 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.

      • ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.




      Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.






      share|improve this answer


























        3












        3








        3







        "To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:




        1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent

        2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist


        You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.





        • 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.

        • ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.




        Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.






        share|improve this answer













        "To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:




        1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent

        2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist


        You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.





        • 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.

        • ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.




        Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        narutonaruto

        160k8153299




        160k8153299






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65928%2ftranslation-of-%25e7%25ad%2594%25e3%2581%2588%25e3%2582%2592%25e7%259f%25a5%25e3%2581%25a3%25e3%2581%25a6%25e3%2581%2584%25e3%2582%258b%25e4%25ba%25ba%25e3%2581%25af%25e3%2581%2584%25e3%2581%25be%25e3%2581%259b%25e3%2582%2593%25e3%2581%25a7%25e3%2581%2597%25e3%2581%259f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75 ...
            Read more

            Berlina muro

            Image
            La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l...
            Read more

            Berlina aerponto

            Image
            Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa...
            Read more