A function which translates a sentence to title-case





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







9












$begingroup$


The task is to write a JavaScript-function which translates a given blank-separated sentence to title-case.



Means that all words shall start with a capital and then the rest of the word in lower-case. But: A certain, specified set of conjunctions, preposition as well as article shall be all lower-case.



Example: "The second of the four items." becomes "The Second of the Four Items.".



Here's my implementation of such a function:






function translateToTitleCase(str) {
const translateWord = (sWord) => {
return sWord.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + sWord.slice(1).toLowerCase();
}

const words = str.split(" ");

words[0] = translateWord(words[0]);

for (let i = 1; i < words.length; i++) {
if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {
words[i] = translateWord(words[i]);
} else {
words[i] = words[i].toLowerCase(); // Make sure is's the correct case, when the sentence (or parts of it) is given in uppercase.
}
}

return words.join(" ");
}

// -- Examples -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
console.log(translateToTitleCase("Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing."));
console.log(translateToTitleCase("the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"));





I think my coding is still a bit "noisy" with the usage of all those brackets, chained methods and concatenation.



Any ideas about how to improve my implementation?



Perhaps some cool new ES6-feature I wasn't aware of.



What would you have done differently and why?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'd argue that the functionality should be changed slightly – this'll trip over words like xkcd and eBay – but I suppose that's not really in-scope for Code Review.
    $endgroup$
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago




















9












$begingroup$


The task is to write a JavaScript-function which translates a given blank-separated sentence to title-case.



Means that all words shall start with a capital and then the rest of the word in lower-case. But: A certain, specified set of conjunctions, preposition as well as article shall be all lower-case.



Example: "The second of the four items." becomes "The Second of the Four Items.".



Here's my implementation of such a function:






function translateToTitleCase(str) {
const translateWord = (sWord) => {
return sWord.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + sWord.slice(1).toLowerCase();
}

const words = str.split(" ");

words[0] = translateWord(words[0]);

for (let i = 1; i < words.length; i++) {
if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {
words[i] = translateWord(words[i]);
} else {
words[i] = words[i].toLowerCase(); // Make sure is's the correct case, when the sentence (or parts of it) is given in uppercase.
}
}

return words.join(" ");
}

// -- Examples -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
console.log(translateToTitleCase("Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing."));
console.log(translateToTitleCase("the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"));





I think my coding is still a bit "noisy" with the usage of all those brackets, chained methods and concatenation.



Any ideas about how to improve my implementation?



Perhaps some cool new ES6-feature I wasn't aware of.



What would you have done differently and why?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'd argue that the functionality should be changed slightly – this'll trip over words like xkcd and eBay – but I suppose that's not really in-scope for Code Review.
    $endgroup$
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago
















9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


The task is to write a JavaScript-function which translates a given blank-separated sentence to title-case.



Means that all words shall start with a capital and then the rest of the word in lower-case. But: A certain, specified set of conjunctions, preposition as well as article shall be all lower-case.



Example: "The second of the four items." becomes "The Second of the Four Items.".



Here's my implementation of such a function:






function translateToTitleCase(str) {
const translateWord = (sWord) => {
return sWord.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + sWord.slice(1).toLowerCase();
}

const words = str.split(" ");

words[0] = translateWord(words[0]);

for (let i = 1; i < words.length; i++) {
if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {
words[i] = translateWord(words[i]);
} else {
words[i] = words[i].toLowerCase(); // Make sure is's the correct case, when the sentence (or parts of it) is given in uppercase.
}
}

return words.join(" ");
}

// -- Examples -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
console.log(translateToTitleCase("Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing."));
console.log(translateToTitleCase("the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"));





I think my coding is still a bit "noisy" with the usage of all those brackets, chained methods and concatenation.



Any ideas about how to improve my implementation?



Perhaps some cool new ES6-feature I wasn't aware of.



What would you have done differently and why?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The task is to write a JavaScript-function which translates a given blank-separated sentence to title-case.



Means that all words shall start with a capital and then the rest of the word in lower-case. But: A certain, specified set of conjunctions, preposition as well as article shall be all lower-case.



Example: "The second of the four items." becomes "The Second of the Four Items.".



Here's my implementation of such a function:






function translateToTitleCase(str) {
const translateWord = (sWord) => {
return sWord.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + sWord.slice(1).toLowerCase();
}

const words = str.split(" ");

words[0] = translateWord(words[0]);

for (let i = 1; i < words.length; i++) {
if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {
words[i] = translateWord(words[i]);
} else {
words[i] = words[i].toLowerCase(); // Make sure is's the correct case, when the sentence (or parts of it) is given in uppercase.
}
}

return words.join(" ");
}

// -- Examples -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
console.log(translateToTitleCase("Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing."));
console.log(translateToTitleCase("the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"));





I think my coding is still a bit "noisy" with the usage of all those brackets, chained methods and concatenation.



Any ideas about how to improve my implementation?



Perhaps some cool new ES6-feature I wasn't aware of.



What would you have done differently and why?






function translateToTitleCase(str) {
const translateWord = (sWord) => {
return sWord.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + sWord.slice(1).toLowerCase();
}

const words = str.split(" ");

words[0] = translateWord(words[0]);

for (let i = 1; i < words.length; i++) {
if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {
words[i] = translateWord(words[i]);
} else {
words[i] = words[i].toLowerCase(); // Make sure is's the correct case, when the sentence (or parts of it) is given in uppercase.
}
}

return words.join(" ");
}

// -- Examples -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
console.log(translateToTitleCase("Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing."));
console.log(translateToTitleCase("the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"));





function translateToTitleCase(str) {
const translateWord = (sWord) => {
return sWord.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + sWord.slice(1).toLowerCase();
}

const words = str.split(" ");

words[0] = translateWord(words[0]);

for (let i = 1; i < words.length; i++) {
if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {
words[i] = translateWord(words[i]);
} else {
words[i] = words[i].toLowerCase(); // Make sure is's the correct case, when the sentence (or parts of it) is given in uppercase.
}
}

return words.join(" ");
}

// -- Examples -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
console.log(translateToTitleCase("Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing."));
console.log(translateToTitleCase("the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"));






javascript strings






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







michael.zech

















asked 2 days ago









michael.zechmichael.zech

1,7851735




1,7851735












  • $begingroup$
    I'd argue that the functionality should be changed slightly – this'll trip over words like xkcd and eBay – but I suppose that's not really in-scope for Code Review.
    $endgroup$
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago




















  • $begingroup$
    I'd argue that the functionality should be changed slightly – this'll trip over words like xkcd and eBay – but I suppose that's not really in-scope for Code Review.
    $endgroup$
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago


















$begingroup$
I'd argue that the functionality should be changed slightly – this'll trip over words like xkcd and eBay – but I suppose that's not really in-scope for Code Review.
$endgroup$
– wizzwizz4
2 days ago






$begingroup$
I'd argue that the functionality should be changed slightly – this'll trip over words like xkcd and eBay – but I suppose that's not really in-scope for Code Review.
$endgroup$
– wizzwizz4
2 days ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

I find this code quite reasonable on the whole, but you might consider the following suggestions relating to consistency, succinctness and semantics.





Move and rename the inner helper function



translateWord is reusable as a general utility function and seems better-placed in the global scope and renamed to titleCase. This meshes with similarly-named Ruby, Python and PHP builtins (titlecase, title, ucfirst, respectively). When I see "translate", I think of linguistics or mathematics before I think of strings or casing.



Avoid excessive calls to toLowerCase



.toLowerCase() is more efficient called once on the entire sentence before splitting rather than incurring the overhead of calling it multiple times per word. With this in mind, you can skip calling the titleCase function described above if you wish.



Improve "ignore" list



if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {


is problematic for a few reasons:




  • It creates a new array object for every word. Move initialization to the top of the function and create it once.


  • Hardcoding restricts your function's reusability. Making this ignore list a default parameter allows the client to adjust the list as needed.

  • Giving this array a variable name makes its purpose more obvious.

  • Although the array is small, it needs to be traversed linearly to perform a lookup; using a set improves semantics, readability and time complexity all at once and is the ideal structure for testing membership.


Avoid the loop



This task is a map operation: each word has a function applied to it. You can roll split, map (your for loop) and join into one call to replace, which takes a regular expression that splits on non-word characters and applies the titleCase function to each one that passes the ignore test.



Minor points





  • sWord.slice(0, 1) can be sWord[0].


  • sWord is an okay variable name, but str (matching your outer function) or word seems more consistent.

  • Unless there is a good hoisting or context reason, I'd make the outer function also use an arrow function for consistency with your inner function.


A rewrite






const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
ignore = new Set(ignore);

return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
word = word.toLowerCase();

if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
return word;
}

return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
});
};

[
"Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
"the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));








share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$


        if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {



    Not a coding issue exactly, but this is missing a lot of words that should not be capitalized. In particular, you only have one of the seven coordinating conjunctions, one of three articles, and two prepositions. Grammar Girl suggests




    “a,” “an,” “and,” “at,” “but,” “by,” “for,” “in,” “nor,” “of,” “on,” “or,” "out," “so,” “the,” “to,” “up,” and “yet.”




    She says this is from AP style (which the Associated Press apparently no longer uses).



    Incidentally, you should also be capitalizing the last word of the title (as well as the first). Your two examples have nouns as the last word, so this gets capitalized correctly. You may want to add an example where the word is in the lower case list. E.g. "If it's the last word of the title, should I capitalize 'the'?"



    If you were trying to implement the Chicago style, this would be much more complicated, as there are some words that can be prepositions, adjectives, or adverbs depending on usage. In Chicago style, you have to parse the sentence grammar to determine what gets capitalized. Also, Chicago style uses lower case for prepositions with four letters or more. So there are far more of them.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "196"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217006%2fa-function-which-translates-a-sentence-to-title-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      11












      $begingroup$

      I find this code quite reasonable on the whole, but you might consider the following suggestions relating to consistency, succinctness and semantics.





      Move and rename the inner helper function



      translateWord is reusable as a general utility function and seems better-placed in the global scope and renamed to titleCase. This meshes with similarly-named Ruby, Python and PHP builtins (titlecase, title, ucfirst, respectively). When I see "translate", I think of linguistics or mathematics before I think of strings or casing.



      Avoid excessive calls to toLowerCase



      .toLowerCase() is more efficient called once on the entire sentence before splitting rather than incurring the overhead of calling it multiple times per word. With this in mind, you can skip calling the titleCase function described above if you wish.



      Improve "ignore" list



      if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {


      is problematic for a few reasons:




      • It creates a new array object for every word. Move initialization to the top of the function and create it once.


      • Hardcoding restricts your function's reusability. Making this ignore list a default parameter allows the client to adjust the list as needed.

      • Giving this array a variable name makes its purpose more obvious.

      • Although the array is small, it needs to be traversed linearly to perform a lookup; using a set improves semantics, readability and time complexity all at once and is the ideal structure for testing membership.


      Avoid the loop



      This task is a map operation: each word has a function applied to it. You can roll split, map (your for loop) and join into one call to replace, which takes a regular expression that splits on non-word characters and applies the titleCase function to each one that passes the ignore test.



      Minor points





      • sWord.slice(0, 1) can be sWord[0].


      • sWord is an okay variable name, but str (matching your outer function) or word seems more consistent.

      • Unless there is a good hoisting or context reason, I'd make the outer function also use an arrow function for consistency with your inner function.


      A rewrite






      const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
      ignore = new Set(ignore);

      return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
      word = word.toLowerCase();

      if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
      return word;
      }

      return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
      });
      };

      [
      "Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
      "the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
      ].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));








      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        11












        $begingroup$

        I find this code quite reasonable on the whole, but you might consider the following suggestions relating to consistency, succinctness and semantics.





        Move and rename the inner helper function



        translateWord is reusable as a general utility function and seems better-placed in the global scope and renamed to titleCase. This meshes with similarly-named Ruby, Python and PHP builtins (titlecase, title, ucfirst, respectively). When I see "translate", I think of linguistics or mathematics before I think of strings or casing.



        Avoid excessive calls to toLowerCase



        .toLowerCase() is more efficient called once on the entire sentence before splitting rather than incurring the overhead of calling it multiple times per word. With this in mind, you can skip calling the titleCase function described above if you wish.



        Improve "ignore" list



        if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {


        is problematic for a few reasons:




        • It creates a new array object for every word. Move initialization to the top of the function and create it once.


        • Hardcoding restricts your function's reusability. Making this ignore list a default parameter allows the client to adjust the list as needed.

        • Giving this array a variable name makes its purpose more obvious.

        • Although the array is small, it needs to be traversed linearly to perform a lookup; using a set improves semantics, readability and time complexity all at once and is the ideal structure for testing membership.


        Avoid the loop



        This task is a map operation: each word has a function applied to it. You can roll split, map (your for loop) and join into one call to replace, which takes a regular expression that splits on non-word characters and applies the titleCase function to each one that passes the ignore test.



        Minor points





        • sWord.slice(0, 1) can be sWord[0].


        • sWord is an okay variable name, but str (matching your outer function) or word seems more consistent.

        • Unless there is a good hoisting or context reason, I'd make the outer function also use an arrow function for consistency with your inner function.


        A rewrite






        const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
        ignore = new Set(ignore);

        return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
        word = word.toLowerCase();

        if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
        return word;
        }

        return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
        });
        };

        [
        "Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
        "the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
        ].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));








        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          11












          11








          11





          $begingroup$

          I find this code quite reasonable on the whole, but you might consider the following suggestions relating to consistency, succinctness and semantics.





          Move and rename the inner helper function



          translateWord is reusable as a general utility function and seems better-placed in the global scope and renamed to titleCase. This meshes with similarly-named Ruby, Python and PHP builtins (titlecase, title, ucfirst, respectively). When I see "translate", I think of linguistics or mathematics before I think of strings or casing.



          Avoid excessive calls to toLowerCase



          .toLowerCase() is more efficient called once on the entire sentence before splitting rather than incurring the overhead of calling it multiple times per word. With this in mind, you can skip calling the titleCase function described above if you wish.



          Improve "ignore" list



          if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {


          is problematic for a few reasons:




          • It creates a new array object for every word. Move initialization to the top of the function and create it once.


          • Hardcoding restricts your function's reusability. Making this ignore list a default parameter allows the client to adjust the list as needed.

          • Giving this array a variable name makes its purpose more obvious.

          • Although the array is small, it needs to be traversed linearly to perform a lookup; using a set improves semantics, readability and time complexity all at once and is the ideal structure for testing membership.


          Avoid the loop



          This task is a map operation: each word has a function applied to it. You can roll split, map (your for loop) and join into one call to replace, which takes a regular expression that splits on non-word characters and applies the titleCase function to each one that passes the ignore test.



          Minor points





          • sWord.slice(0, 1) can be sWord[0].


          • sWord is an okay variable name, but str (matching your outer function) or word seems more consistent.

          • Unless there is a good hoisting or context reason, I'd make the outer function also use an arrow function for consistency with your inner function.


          A rewrite






          const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
          ignore = new Set(ignore);

          return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
          word = word.toLowerCase();

          if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
          return word;
          }

          return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
          });
          };

          [
          "Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
          "the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
          ].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));








          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I find this code quite reasonable on the whole, but you might consider the following suggestions relating to consistency, succinctness and semantics.





          Move and rename the inner helper function



          translateWord is reusable as a general utility function and seems better-placed in the global scope and renamed to titleCase. This meshes with similarly-named Ruby, Python and PHP builtins (titlecase, title, ucfirst, respectively). When I see "translate", I think of linguistics or mathematics before I think of strings or casing.



          Avoid excessive calls to toLowerCase



          .toLowerCase() is more efficient called once on the entire sentence before splitting rather than incurring the overhead of calling it multiple times per word. With this in mind, you can skip calling the titleCase function described above if you wish.



          Improve "ignore" list



          if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {


          is problematic for a few reasons:




          • It creates a new array object for every word. Move initialization to the top of the function and create it once.


          • Hardcoding restricts your function's reusability. Making this ignore list a default parameter allows the client to adjust the list as needed.

          • Giving this array a variable name makes its purpose more obvious.

          • Although the array is small, it needs to be traversed linearly to perform a lookup; using a set improves semantics, readability and time complexity all at once and is the ideal structure for testing membership.


          Avoid the loop



          This task is a map operation: each word has a function applied to it. You can roll split, map (your for loop) and join into one call to replace, which takes a regular expression that splits on non-word characters and applies the titleCase function to each one that passes the ignore test.



          Minor points





          • sWord.slice(0, 1) can be sWord[0].


          • sWord is an okay variable name, but str (matching your outer function) or word seems more consistent.

          • Unless there is a good hoisting or context reason, I'd make the outer function also use an arrow function for consistency with your inner function.


          A rewrite






          const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
          ignore = new Set(ignore);

          return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
          word = word.toLowerCase();

          if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
          return word;
          }

          return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
          });
          };

          [
          "Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
          "the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
          ].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));








          const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
          ignore = new Set(ignore);

          return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
          word = word.toLowerCase();

          if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
          return word;
          }

          return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
          });
          };

          [
          "Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
          "the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
          ].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));





          const titleCaseWords = (words, ignore=["of", "and", "the", "to"]) => {
          ignore = new Set(ignore);

          return words.replace(/w+/g, (word, i) => {
          word = word.toLowerCase();

          if (i && ignore.has(word)) {
          return word;
          }

          return word[0].toUpperCase() + word.slice(1);
          });
          };

          [
          "Into unmerciful the entreating stronger to of word guessing.",
          "the OLD MAN aND THE sEa"
          ].forEach(test => console.log(titleCaseWords(test)));






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          ggorlenggorlen

          651314




          651314

























              2












              $begingroup$


                  if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {



              Not a coding issue exactly, but this is missing a lot of words that should not be capitalized. In particular, you only have one of the seven coordinating conjunctions, one of three articles, and two prepositions. Grammar Girl suggests




              “a,” “an,” “and,” “at,” “but,” “by,” “for,” “in,” “nor,” “of,” “on,” “or,” "out," “so,” “the,” “to,” “up,” and “yet.”




              She says this is from AP style (which the Associated Press apparently no longer uses).



              Incidentally, you should also be capitalizing the last word of the title (as well as the first). Your two examples have nouns as the last word, so this gets capitalized correctly. You may want to add an example where the word is in the lower case list. E.g. "If it's the last word of the title, should I capitalize 'the'?"



              If you were trying to implement the Chicago style, this would be much more complicated, as there are some words that can be prepositions, adjectives, or adverbs depending on usage. In Chicago style, you have to parse the sentence grammar to determine what gets capitalized. Also, Chicago style uses lower case for prepositions with four letters or more. So there are far more of them.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$


                    if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {



                Not a coding issue exactly, but this is missing a lot of words that should not be capitalized. In particular, you only have one of the seven coordinating conjunctions, one of three articles, and two prepositions. Grammar Girl suggests




                “a,” “an,” “and,” “at,” “but,” “by,” “for,” “in,” “nor,” “of,” “on,” “or,” "out," “so,” “the,” “to,” “up,” and “yet.”




                She says this is from AP style (which the Associated Press apparently no longer uses).



                Incidentally, you should also be capitalizing the last word of the title (as well as the first). Your two examples have nouns as the last word, so this gets capitalized correctly. You may want to add an example where the word is in the lower case list. E.g. "If it's the last word of the title, should I capitalize 'the'?"



                If you were trying to implement the Chicago style, this would be much more complicated, as there are some words that can be prepositions, adjectives, or adverbs depending on usage. In Chicago style, you have to parse the sentence grammar to determine what gets capitalized. Also, Chicago style uses lower case for prepositions with four letters or more. So there are far more of them.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$


                      if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {



                  Not a coding issue exactly, but this is missing a lot of words that should not be capitalized. In particular, you only have one of the seven coordinating conjunctions, one of three articles, and two prepositions. Grammar Girl suggests




                  “a,” “an,” “and,” “at,” “but,” “by,” “for,” “in,” “nor,” “of,” “on,” “or,” "out," “so,” “the,” “to,” “up,” and “yet.”




                  She says this is from AP style (which the Associated Press apparently no longer uses).



                  Incidentally, you should also be capitalizing the last word of the title (as well as the first). Your two examples have nouns as the last word, so this gets capitalized correctly. You may want to add an example where the word is in the lower case list. E.g. "If it's the last word of the title, should I capitalize 'the'?"



                  If you were trying to implement the Chicago style, this would be much more complicated, as there are some words that can be prepositions, adjectives, or adverbs depending on usage. In Chicago style, you have to parse the sentence grammar to determine what gets capitalized. Also, Chicago style uses lower case for prepositions with four letters or more. So there are far more of them.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$




                      if (!["of", "and", "the", "to"].includes(words[i].toLowerCase())) {



                  Not a coding issue exactly, but this is missing a lot of words that should not be capitalized. In particular, you only have one of the seven coordinating conjunctions, one of three articles, and two prepositions. Grammar Girl suggests




                  “a,” “an,” “and,” “at,” “but,” “by,” “for,” “in,” “nor,” “of,” “on,” “or,” "out," “so,” “the,” “to,” “up,” and “yet.”




                  She says this is from AP style (which the Associated Press apparently no longer uses).



                  Incidentally, you should also be capitalizing the last word of the title (as well as the first). Your two examples have nouns as the last word, so this gets capitalized correctly. You may want to add an example where the word is in the lower case list. E.g. "If it's the last word of the title, should I capitalize 'the'?"



                  If you were trying to implement the Chicago style, this would be much more complicated, as there are some words that can be prepositions, adjectives, or adverbs depending on usage. In Chicago style, you have to parse the sentence grammar to determine what gets capitalized. Also, Chicago style uses lower case for prepositions with four letters or more. So there are far more of them.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  mdfst13mdfst13

                  17.9k62257




                  17.9k62257






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217006%2fa-function-which-translates-a-sentence-to-title-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                      Berlina muro

                      Berlina aerponto