Determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.












2












$begingroup$


Today I heard in a lecture (some video on YouTube) that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.



I am not able to understand the above statement. I know that determinant is a special function which assign to each $x$ in $mathbb K^{n times n}$ a scalar. This is the intuitive idea. And this map is not linear as well. One way to see this is to consider the fact that determinant of $cA$ is $c^ndet(A)$



Can someone please explain what did the person mean by saying that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of matrix?






linear-algebra matrices determinant







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – StammeringMathematician
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    48 mins ago


















2












$begingroup$


Today I heard in a lecture (some video on YouTube) that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.



I am not able to understand the above statement. I know that determinant is a special function which assign to each $x$ in $mathbb K^{n times n}$ a scalar. This is the intuitive idea. And this map is not linear as well. One way to see this is to consider the fact that determinant of $cA$ is $c^ndet(A)$



Can someone please explain what did the person mean by saying that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of matrix?






linear-algebra matrices determinant







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – StammeringMathematician
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    48 mins ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


Today I heard in a lecture (some video on YouTube) that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.



I am not able to understand the above statement. I know that determinant is a special function which assign to each $x$ in $mathbb K^{n times n}$ a scalar. This is the intuitive idea. And this map is not linear as well. One way to see this is to consider the fact that determinant of $cA$ is $c^ndet(A)$



Can someone please explain what did the person mean by saying that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of matrix?






linear-algebra matrices determinant







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Today I heard in a lecture (some video on YouTube) that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.



I am not able to understand the above statement. I know that determinant is a special function which assign to each $x$ in $mathbb K^{n times n}$ a scalar. This is the intuitive idea. And this map is not linear as well. One way to see this is to consider the fact that determinant of $cA$ is $c^ndet(A)$



Can someone please explain what did the person mean by saying that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of matrix?






linear-algebra matrices determinant




linear-algebra matrices determinant






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 57 mins ago









Rodrigo de Azevedo

13.2k41961




13.2k41961










asked 1 hour ago









StammeringMathematicianStammeringMathematician

2,8121324




2,8121324












  • $begingroup$
    I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – StammeringMathematician
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    48 mins ago




















  • $begingroup$
    I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – StammeringMathematician
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    48 mins ago


















$begingroup$
I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right?
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
49 mins ago




$begingroup$
I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right?
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
49 mins ago












$begingroup$
Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
48 mins ago






$begingroup$
Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
48 mins ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

If $r_1, ldots r_n$ are the rows of the matrix and $r_i = sa+tb$, where $s,t$ are scalars and $a,b$ are row vectors, then you have



$$detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \r_i \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ sa+tb \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = sdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ a \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} + tdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ b \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix}$$



This holds for any row $i=1,ldots , n$. And similarly this also applies to columns.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Let $M$ be an $ntimes n$ matrix with rows $mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n$. Then we may think of the determinant as a function of the rows
    $$
    det(M)=det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
    $$
    To say that $det$ is a linear function of the rows means that if we scale a single row by $c$, the result is scaled by $c$; that is,
    $$
    det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_{i-1},cmathbf{r}_i,mathbf{r}_{i+1}dotsmathbf{r}_n)=cdet(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
    $$
    Similarly if we fix all but one row (say the first), we obtain
    $$
    det(mathbf{x}+mathbf{r}_1,mathbf{r}_2,dots,mathbf{r}_n)=det(mathbf{x},dots,mathbf{r}_n)+det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
    $$
    Your mistake was that you scale all the rows at once; to be linear, you can only do things "one at a time"






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3189406%2fdeterminant-is-linear-as-a-function-of-each-of-the-rows-of-the-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      If $r_1, ldots r_n$ are the rows of the matrix and $r_i = sa+tb$, where $s,t$ are scalars and $a,b$ are row vectors, then you have



      $$detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \r_i \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ sa+tb \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = sdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ a \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} + tdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ b \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix}$$



      This holds for any row $i=1,ldots , n$. And similarly this also applies to columns.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        If $r_1, ldots r_n$ are the rows of the matrix and $r_i = sa+tb$, where $s,t$ are scalars and $a,b$ are row vectors, then you have



        $$detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \r_i \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ sa+tb \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = sdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ a \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} + tdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ b \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix}$$



        This holds for any row $i=1,ldots , n$. And similarly this also applies to columns.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          If $r_1, ldots r_n$ are the rows of the matrix and $r_i = sa+tb$, where $s,t$ are scalars and $a,b$ are row vectors, then you have



          $$detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \r_i \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ sa+tb \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = sdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ a \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} + tdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ b \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix}$$



          This holds for any row $i=1,ldots , n$. And similarly this also applies to columns.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If $r_1, ldots r_n$ are the rows of the matrix and $r_i = sa+tb$, where $s,t$ are scalars and $a,b$ are row vectors, then you have



          $$detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \r_i \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = detbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ sa+tb \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} = sdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ a \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix} + tdetbegin{pmatrix}r_1 \ vdots \ b \ vdots \ r_nend{pmatrix}$$



          This holds for any row $i=1,ldots , n$. And similarly this also applies to columns.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 52 mins ago









          trancelocationtrancelocation

          14.1k1829




          14.1k1829























              2












              $begingroup$

              Let $M$ be an $ntimes n$ matrix with rows $mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n$. Then we may think of the determinant as a function of the rows
              $$
              det(M)=det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
              $$
              To say that $det$ is a linear function of the rows means that if we scale a single row by $c$, the result is scaled by $c$; that is,
              $$
              det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_{i-1},cmathbf{r}_i,mathbf{r}_{i+1}dotsmathbf{r}_n)=cdet(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
              $$
              Similarly if we fix all but one row (say the first), we obtain
              $$
              det(mathbf{x}+mathbf{r}_1,mathbf{r}_2,dots,mathbf{r}_n)=det(mathbf{x},dots,mathbf{r}_n)+det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
              $$
              Your mistake was that you scale all the rows at once; to be linear, you can only do things "one at a time"






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Let $M$ be an $ntimes n$ matrix with rows $mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n$. Then we may think of the determinant as a function of the rows
                $$
                det(M)=det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                $$
                To say that $det$ is a linear function of the rows means that if we scale a single row by $c$, the result is scaled by $c$; that is,
                $$
                det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_{i-1},cmathbf{r}_i,mathbf{r}_{i+1}dotsmathbf{r}_n)=cdet(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                $$
                Similarly if we fix all but one row (say the first), we obtain
                $$
                det(mathbf{x}+mathbf{r}_1,mathbf{r}_2,dots,mathbf{r}_n)=det(mathbf{x},dots,mathbf{r}_n)+det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                $$
                Your mistake was that you scale all the rows at once; to be linear, you can only do things "one at a time"






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $M$ be an $ntimes n$ matrix with rows $mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n$. Then we may think of the determinant as a function of the rows
                  $$
                  det(M)=det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                  $$
                  To say that $det$ is a linear function of the rows means that if we scale a single row by $c$, the result is scaled by $c$; that is,
                  $$
                  det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_{i-1},cmathbf{r}_i,mathbf{r}_{i+1}dotsmathbf{r}_n)=cdet(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                  $$
                  Similarly if we fix all but one row (say the first), we obtain
                  $$
                  det(mathbf{x}+mathbf{r}_1,mathbf{r}_2,dots,mathbf{r}_n)=det(mathbf{x},dots,mathbf{r}_n)+det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                  $$
                  Your mistake was that you scale all the rows at once; to be linear, you can only do things "one at a time"






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let $M$ be an $ntimes n$ matrix with rows $mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n$. Then we may think of the determinant as a function of the rows
                  $$
                  det(M)=det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                  $$
                  To say that $det$ is a linear function of the rows means that if we scale a single row by $c$, the result is scaled by $c$; that is,
                  $$
                  det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_{i-1},cmathbf{r}_i,mathbf{r}_{i+1}dotsmathbf{r}_n)=cdet(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                  $$
                  Similarly if we fix all but one row (say the first), we obtain
                  $$
                  det(mathbf{x}+mathbf{r}_1,mathbf{r}_2,dots,mathbf{r}_n)=det(mathbf{x},dots,mathbf{r}_n)+det(mathbf{r}_1,dots,mathbf{r}_n).
                  $$
                  Your mistake was that you scale all the rows at once; to be linear, you can only do things "one at a time"







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 50 mins ago









                  TomGrubbTomGrubb

                  11.2k11639




                  11.2k11639






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3189406%2fdeterminant-is-linear-as-a-function-of-each-of-the-rows-of-the-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 4 I'm referring to Picard, Riker, Data, Worf, Geordi, Dr. Crusher, Wesley Crusher, Chief O'Brien and family, Deanna Troi, Guinan. I know Picard and Worf show up on DS9, though I haven't seen it myself. I'm curious what happened to the characters after that last episode of TNG? star-trek star-trek-tng share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Ham Sandwich 6,051 2 25 75
                      Read more

                      Berlina muro

                      Image
                      La berlina muro ĉe Bethaniendamm, 1986 La berlina muro aŭ simple la muro [1] , nomita ankaŭ "kontraŭfaŝisma remparo" en propaganda lingvo de la iama Germana Demokratia Respubliko, estis parto de la interngermana limo, kiu dividis de la 13-a de aŭgusto 1961 ĝis la 9-a de novembro 1989 okcidentan Berlinon de la orienta parto de la urbo kaj de la ĉirkaŭa tereno de la GDR. Ĝi estis unu el la plej famaj simboloj de la malvarma milito kaj de la disdivido de Germanio. Pli ol simpla muro, la berlina muro estis fakte tuta defendokonstruaĵo kun du muroj, ena malplena strio, rondirvojo, gardturoj kaj alarmsistemoj. Dum la provo transiri la severe garditan limon al okcidenta Berlino multaj homoj estis mortigitaj. La preciza nombro de viktimoj estas pridisputita kaj ne certa; la nombroj anoncataj varias inter 86 kaj 238 mortintoj. La malplifortiĝo de Sovetunio kaj la politiko de liberigo gvidita de Miĥail Gorbaĉov ebligis al la orientgermanoj faligi la 9-an de novembro 1989 l
                      Read more

                      Berlina aerponto

                      Image
                      Flugkoridoroj dum la blokado de Berlino La Berlina aerponto estas la provizigo de okcidenta Berlino per aviadiloj fare de la aliancanoj inter la 23-a de junio 1948 kaj la 12-a de majo 1949 dum la blokado de Berlino fare de la sovetia armeo. Enhavo 1 Historio 1.1 La aerkoridoroj 1.2 Unuaj flugoj 1.3 Plibonigo de la aerponto 1.4 Fino de la aerponto 1.5 Rozinbombiloj 1.6 Bilanco 2 Flughavenoj 2.1 Berlino 2.2 Okcidenta Germanio 3 Aviadiloj de la berlina aerponto 4 15-a datreveno de la aerponto 5 Bibliografio 6 Referencoj 7 Eksteraj ligiloj Historio | General Lucius D. Clay, militguberniestro de la usona okupadzono Jam antaŭ la berlina aerponto estiĝis la malgranda aerponto . La estro de la sovetia militadministracio en Germanio, Vasili Daniloviĉ Sokolovski, ordonis la 1-an de aprilo 1948, kiel reago al la konferenco de Londono inter britoj, francoj kaj reprezentantoj de Benelukso pri aligo de Germa
                      Read more