Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by...
I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):
Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.
X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.
Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?
That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?
air-travel luggage lost-luggage
add a comment |
I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):
Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.
X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.
Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?
That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?
air-travel luggage lost-luggage
add a comment |
I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):
Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.
X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.
Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?
That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?
air-travel luggage lost-luggage
I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):
Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.
X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.
Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?
That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?
air-travel luggage lost-luggage
air-travel luggage lost-luggage
asked 5 hours ago
Franck DernoncourtFranck Dernoncourt
5,11054075
5,11054075
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.
The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).
The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.
This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.
To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.
With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.
Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.
The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.
This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131553%2fwhy-does-the-small-barcode-on-the-stickers-placed-on-ones-check-in-bags-general%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.
The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).
The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.
This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.
To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.
With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.
Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.
The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.
This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)
add a comment |
The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.
The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).
The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.
This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.
To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.
With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.
Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.
The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.
This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)
add a comment |
The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.
The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).
The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.
This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.
To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.
With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.
Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.
The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.
This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)
The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.
The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).
The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.
This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.
To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.
With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.
Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.
The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.
This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)
edited 3 hours ago
Franck Dernoncourt
5,11054075
5,11054075
answered 3 hours ago
DocDoc
72.5k4167270
72.5k4167270
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131553%2fwhy-does-the-small-barcode-on-the-stickers-placed-on-ones-check-in-bags-general%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown