Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by...












1















I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):




Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.



X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.




Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?



That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?










share|improve this question



























    1















    I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):




    Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.



    X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.




    Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?



    That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):




      Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.



      X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.




      Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?



      That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?










      share|improve this question














      I read on https://www.ausbt.com.au/this-simple-trick-helps-ensure-your-suitcase-arrives-on-the-belt (mirror):




      Even if you do attach a bingo [= small barcode sticker on one's check-in bags or on the main baggage tag ], many only feature the barcode number which generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours.



      X - Former Baggage Tracing Manager for a large airline.




      Why does the small barcode on the stickers placed on one's check-in bags generally cannot be accessed by airport staff after 72 hours?



      That seems counterintuitive to me to have a short expiration timeframe, so I wonder whether there exist constraints I am not aware of. Perhaps the quote is incorrect?







      air-travel luggage lost-luggage






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      Franck DernoncourtFranck Dernoncourt

      5,11054075




      5,11054075






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.



          The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).



          The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.



          This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.



          To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.



          With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.



          Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.



          The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.



          This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "273"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131553%2fwhy-does-the-small-barcode-on-the-stickers-placed-on-ones-check-in-bags-general%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.



            The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).



            The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.



            This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.



            To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.



            With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.



            Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.



            The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.



            This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)






            share|improve this answer






























              5














              The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.



              The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).



              The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.



              This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.



              To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.



              With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.



              Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.



              The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.



              This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)






              share|improve this answer




























                5












                5








                5







                The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.



                The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).



                The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.



                This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.



                To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.



                With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.



                Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.



                The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.



                This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)






                share|improve this answer















                The barcode on the baggage tag consists of a 10 digit number, of which 9 are used to identify the bag.



                The first 3 of these 9 digits will usually be the specific code allocated to the airline by IATA. In most cases this will be the same as the 3 digit codes used at the start of ticket numbers (eg, 016 for United Airlines, 001 for American Airlines, etc).



                The remaining 6 digits are assigned by the airline and are a "serial number" for that bag. The airline can assign these in any way they want, but for simplicity you could presume they are allocated sequentially.



                This means that for any one airline there are only 1 million unique baggage tag numbers that could be generated.



                To pick a single airline as an example, United Airlines flies around 150 million passengers per year. If we presume that each one of them checks on average 1 bag, that means they carry around 150 million bags per year. The number will actually be a little lower as the 150 million number includes connecting flights - so lets call it a nice round 100 million bags/year.



                With only 1 million unique identifiers for 100 million bags, that means they will need to re-use the numbers roughly every 365x(1/100) =~ 3.5 days.



                Thus once the number gets to a few days old, there is a non-zero chance that it will be re-issued. For smaller airlines this might not occur for weeks or months, but for larger airlines it could occur within days.



                The airline themselves will almost certainly maintain a longer history of these tags for use in tracing (for example) lost or delayed bags.



                This is very similar to 'confirmation number' used by airlines. These are 5 or 6 digit "numbers" and thus have a limited range of values (there are often rules around which letters/digits can be used in which positions, so it's difficult to calculate an exact range - it's higher than baggage tags, but far from infinite). As a result these codes are re-used, and thus they are only valid for the length of your booking and for a very short period of time afterwards (often measured in days or at most weeks, depending on the airline)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago









                Franck Dernoncourt

                5,11054075




                5,11054075










                answered 3 hours ago









                DocDoc

                72.5k4167270




                72.5k4167270






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131553%2fwhy-does-the-small-barcode-on-the-stickers-placed-on-ones-check-in-bags-general%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

                    Berlina muro

                    Berlina aerponto