How to obtain Confidence Intervals for a LASSO regression?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I'm very new from R. I have this code for a LASSO regression:
X <- X <- as.matrix(read.csv2("DB_LASSO_ERP.csv"))
y <- read.csv2("OUTCOME_LASSO_ERP.csv",header=F)$V1
fit <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1)
crossval <- cv.glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial")
penalty <- crossval$lambda.min
fit1 <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1, lambda = penalty)
I want to obtain Confidence Intervals for this coefficients. How can I do? Can you help me with the script please? I have very few experience with R.
Thanks!
regression confidence-interval lasso glmnet
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm very new from R. I have this code for a LASSO regression:
X <- X <- as.matrix(read.csv2("DB_LASSO_ERP.csv"))
y <- read.csv2("OUTCOME_LASSO_ERP.csv",header=F)$V1
fit <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1)
crossval <- cv.glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial")
penalty <- crossval$lambda.min
fit1 <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1, lambda = penalty)
I want to obtain Confidence Intervals for this coefficients. How can I do? Can you help me with the script please? I have very few experience with R.
Thanks!
regression confidence-interval lasso glmnet
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The answer here suggests that there is no consensus on how to calculate the standard errors of LASSO. Since you need the standard errors for confidence interval, you have to be very careful
$endgroup$
– V. Aslanyan
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The link provided by @V.Aslanyan is quite useful, but note that the initial discussion on that page (from 2014) pre-dated much subsequent work on this topic.
$endgroup$
– EdM
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm very new from R. I have this code for a LASSO regression:
X <- X <- as.matrix(read.csv2("DB_LASSO_ERP.csv"))
y <- read.csv2("OUTCOME_LASSO_ERP.csv",header=F)$V1
fit <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1)
crossval <- cv.glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial")
penalty <- crossval$lambda.min
fit1 <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1, lambda = penalty)
I want to obtain Confidence Intervals for this coefficients. How can I do? Can you help me with the script please? I have very few experience with R.
Thanks!
regression confidence-interval lasso glmnet
New contributor
$endgroup$
I'm very new from R. I have this code for a LASSO regression:
X <- X <- as.matrix(read.csv2("DB_LASSO_ERP.csv"))
y <- read.csv2("OUTCOME_LASSO_ERP.csv",header=F)$V1
fit <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1)
crossval <- cv.glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial")
penalty <- crossval$lambda.min
fit1 <- glmnet(x = X, y = y, family = "binomial", alpha = 1, lambda = penalty)
I want to obtain Confidence Intervals for this coefficients. How can I do? Can you help me with the script please? I have very few experience with R.
Thanks!
regression confidence-interval lasso glmnet
regression confidence-interval lasso glmnet
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
AlfonsoAlfonso
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
The answer here suggests that there is no consensus on how to calculate the standard errors of LASSO. Since you need the standard errors for confidence interval, you have to be very careful
$endgroup$
– V. Aslanyan
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The link provided by @V.Aslanyan is quite useful, but note that the initial discussion on that page (from 2014) pre-dated much subsequent work on this topic.
$endgroup$
– EdM
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The answer here suggests that there is no consensus on how to calculate the standard errors of LASSO. Since you need the standard errors for confidence interval, you have to be very careful
$endgroup$
– V. Aslanyan
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The link provided by @V.Aslanyan is quite useful, but note that the initial discussion on that page (from 2014) pre-dated much subsequent work on this topic.
$endgroup$
– EdM
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
The answer here suggests that there is no consensus on how to calculate the standard errors of LASSO. Since you need the standard errors for confidence interval, you have to be very careful
$endgroup$
– V. Aslanyan
yesterday
$begingroup$
The answer here suggests that there is no consensus on how to calculate the standard errors of LASSO. Since you need the standard errors for confidence interval, you have to be very careful
$endgroup$
– V. Aslanyan
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
The link provided by @V.Aslanyan is quite useful, but note that the initial discussion on that page (from 2014) pre-dated much subsequent work on this topic.
$endgroup$
– EdM
yesterday
$begingroup$
The link provided by @V.Aslanyan is quite useful, but note that the initial discussion on that page (from 2014) pre-dated much subsequent work on this topic.
$endgroup$
– EdM
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Please think very carefully about why you want confidence intervals for the LASSO coefficients and how you will interpret them. This is not an easy problem.
The predictors chosen by LASSO (as for any feature-selection method) can be highly dependent on the data sample at hand. You can examine this in your own data by repeating your LASSO model-building procedure on multiple bootstrap samples of the data. If you have predictors that are correlated with each other, the specific predictors chosen by LASSO are likely to differ among models based on the different bootstrap samples. So what do you mean by a confidence interval for a coefficient for a predictor, say predictor $x_1$, if $x_1$ wouldn't even have been chosen by LASSO if you had worked with a different sample from the same population?
The quality of predictions from a LASSO model is typically of more interest than are confidence intervals for the individual coefficients. Despite the instability in feature selection, LASSO-based models can be useful for prediction. The selection of 1 from among several correlated predictors might be somewhat arbitrary, but the 1 selected serves as a rough proxy for the others and thus can lead to valid predictions. You can test the performance of your LASSO approach by seeing how well the models based on multiple bootstrapped samples work on the full original data set.
That said, there is recent work on principled ways to obtain confidence intervals and on related issues in inference after LASSO. This page and its links is a good place to start. The issues are discussed in more detail in Section 6.3 of Statistical Learning with Sparsity. There is also a package selectiveInference in R that implements these methods. But these are based on specific assumptions that might not hold in your data. If you do choose to use this approach, make sure to understand the conditions under which the approach is valid and exactly what those confidence intervals really mean. That statistical issue, rather than the R coding issue, is what is crucial here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Alfonso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f402267%2fhow-to-obtain-confidence-intervals-for-a-lasso-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Please think very carefully about why you want confidence intervals for the LASSO coefficients and how you will interpret them. This is not an easy problem.
The predictors chosen by LASSO (as for any feature-selection method) can be highly dependent on the data sample at hand. You can examine this in your own data by repeating your LASSO model-building procedure on multiple bootstrap samples of the data. If you have predictors that are correlated with each other, the specific predictors chosen by LASSO are likely to differ among models based on the different bootstrap samples. So what do you mean by a confidence interval for a coefficient for a predictor, say predictor $x_1$, if $x_1$ wouldn't even have been chosen by LASSO if you had worked with a different sample from the same population?
The quality of predictions from a LASSO model is typically of more interest than are confidence intervals for the individual coefficients. Despite the instability in feature selection, LASSO-based models can be useful for prediction. The selection of 1 from among several correlated predictors might be somewhat arbitrary, but the 1 selected serves as a rough proxy for the others and thus can lead to valid predictions. You can test the performance of your LASSO approach by seeing how well the models based on multiple bootstrapped samples work on the full original data set.
That said, there is recent work on principled ways to obtain confidence intervals and on related issues in inference after LASSO. This page and its links is a good place to start. The issues are discussed in more detail in Section 6.3 of Statistical Learning with Sparsity. There is also a package selectiveInference in R that implements these methods. But these are based on specific assumptions that might not hold in your data. If you do choose to use this approach, make sure to understand the conditions under which the approach is valid and exactly what those confidence intervals really mean. That statistical issue, rather than the R coding issue, is what is crucial here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please think very carefully about why you want confidence intervals for the LASSO coefficients and how you will interpret them. This is not an easy problem.
The predictors chosen by LASSO (as for any feature-selection method) can be highly dependent on the data sample at hand. You can examine this in your own data by repeating your LASSO model-building procedure on multiple bootstrap samples of the data. If you have predictors that are correlated with each other, the specific predictors chosen by LASSO are likely to differ among models based on the different bootstrap samples. So what do you mean by a confidence interval for a coefficient for a predictor, say predictor $x_1$, if $x_1$ wouldn't even have been chosen by LASSO if you had worked with a different sample from the same population?
The quality of predictions from a LASSO model is typically of more interest than are confidence intervals for the individual coefficients. Despite the instability in feature selection, LASSO-based models can be useful for prediction. The selection of 1 from among several correlated predictors might be somewhat arbitrary, but the 1 selected serves as a rough proxy for the others and thus can lead to valid predictions. You can test the performance of your LASSO approach by seeing how well the models based on multiple bootstrapped samples work on the full original data set.
That said, there is recent work on principled ways to obtain confidence intervals and on related issues in inference after LASSO. This page and its links is a good place to start. The issues are discussed in more detail in Section 6.3 of Statistical Learning with Sparsity. There is also a package selectiveInference in R that implements these methods. But these are based on specific assumptions that might not hold in your data. If you do choose to use this approach, make sure to understand the conditions under which the approach is valid and exactly what those confidence intervals really mean. That statistical issue, rather than the R coding issue, is what is crucial here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please think very carefully about why you want confidence intervals for the LASSO coefficients and how you will interpret them. This is not an easy problem.
The predictors chosen by LASSO (as for any feature-selection method) can be highly dependent on the data sample at hand. You can examine this in your own data by repeating your LASSO model-building procedure on multiple bootstrap samples of the data. If you have predictors that are correlated with each other, the specific predictors chosen by LASSO are likely to differ among models based on the different bootstrap samples. So what do you mean by a confidence interval for a coefficient for a predictor, say predictor $x_1$, if $x_1$ wouldn't even have been chosen by LASSO if you had worked with a different sample from the same population?
The quality of predictions from a LASSO model is typically of more interest than are confidence intervals for the individual coefficients. Despite the instability in feature selection, LASSO-based models can be useful for prediction. The selection of 1 from among several correlated predictors might be somewhat arbitrary, but the 1 selected serves as a rough proxy for the others and thus can lead to valid predictions. You can test the performance of your LASSO approach by seeing how well the models based on multiple bootstrapped samples work on the full original data set.
That said, there is recent work on principled ways to obtain confidence intervals and on related issues in inference after LASSO. This page and its links is a good place to start. The issues are discussed in more detail in Section 6.3 of Statistical Learning with Sparsity. There is also a package selectiveInference in R that implements these methods. But these are based on specific assumptions that might not hold in your data. If you do choose to use this approach, make sure to understand the conditions under which the approach is valid and exactly what those confidence intervals really mean. That statistical issue, rather than the R coding issue, is what is crucial here.
$endgroup$
Please think very carefully about why you want confidence intervals for the LASSO coefficients and how you will interpret them. This is not an easy problem.
The predictors chosen by LASSO (as for any feature-selection method) can be highly dependent on the data sample at hand. You can examine this in your own data by repeating your LASSO model-building procedure on multiple bootstrap samples of the data. If you have predictors that are correlated with each other, the specific predictors chosen by LASSO are likely to differ among models based on the different bootstrap samples. So what do you mean by a confidence interval for a coefficient for a predictor, say predictor $x_1$, if $x_1$ wouldn't even have been chosen by LASSO if you had worked with a different sample from the same population?
The quality of predictions from a LASSO model is typically of more interest than are confidence intervals for the individual coefficients. Despite the instability in feature selection, LASSO-based models can be useful for prediction. The selection of 1 from among several correlated predictors might be somewhat arbitrary, but the 1 selected serves as a rough proxy for the others and thus can lead to valid predictions. You can test the performance of your LASSO approach by seeing how well the models based on multiple bootstrapped samples work on the full original data set.
That said, there is recent work on principled ways to obtain confidence intervals and on related issues in inference after LASSO. This page and its links is a good place to start. The issues are discussed in more detail in Section 6.3 of Statistical Learning with Sparsity. There is also a package selectiveInference in R that implements these methods. But these are based on specific assumptions that might not hold in your data. If you do choose to use this approach, make sure to understand the conditions under which the approach is valid and exactly what those confidence intervals really mean. That statistical issue, rather than the R coding issue, is what is crucial here.
edited 12 hours ago
answered yesterday
EdMEdM
22.3k23496
22.3k23496
add a comment |
add a comment |
Alfonso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alfonso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alfonso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alfonso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f402267%2fhow-to-obtain-confidence-intervals-for-a-lasso-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The answer here suggests that there is no consensus on how to calculate the standard errors of LASSO. Since you need the standard errors for confidence interval, you have to be very careful
$endgroup$
– V. Aslanyan
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
The link provided by @V.Aslanyan is quite useful, but note that the initial discussion on that page (from 2014) pre-dated much subsequent work on this topic.
$endgroup$
– EdM
yesterday