How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure












14















It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday













  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    yesterday











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    yesterday


















14















It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday













  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    yesterday











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    yesterday
















14












14








14


1






It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?










share|improve this question
















It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?







notation time-signatures meter engraving






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Richard

45.2k7106195




45.2k7106195










asked yesterday









CreyndersCreynders

8041315




8041315








  • 4





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday













  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    yesterday











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    yesterday
















  • 4





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday













  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    yesterday











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    yesterday











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    yesterday










4




4





...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

– Tetsujin
yesterday







...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

– Tetsujin
yesterday















Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

– Creynders
yesterday





Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

– Creynders
yesterday













I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

– Tetsujin
yesterday





I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

– Tetsujin
yesterday













Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

– Ian Goldby
yesterday





Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

– Ian Goldby
yesterday













8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

– Ringo
yesterday







8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

– Ringo
yesterday












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















33














Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    yesterday



















15














One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer
























  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    yesterday





















13














As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer
























  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    yesterday





















6














Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 8





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    yesterday








  • 3





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    yesterday






  • 1





    @ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

    – Ian Goldby
    16 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82586%2fhow-to-notate-time-signature-switching-consistently-every-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









33














Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    yesterday
















33














Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    yesterday














33












33








33







Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer















Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









RichardRichard

45.2k7106195




45.2k7106195








  • 6





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    yesterday














  • 6





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    yesterday








6




6





Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

– Creynders
yesterday





Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

– Creynders
yesterday











15














One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer
























  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    yesterday


















15














One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer
























  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    yesterday
















15












15








15







One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer













One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Andrew LeachAndrew Leach

51729




51729













  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    yesterday





















  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    yesterday



















You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

– trlkly
yesterday







You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

– trlkly
yesterday













13














As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer
























  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    yesterday


















13














As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer
























  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    yesterday
















13












13








13







As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer













As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Ian GoldbyIan Goldby

355110




355110













  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    yesterday





















  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    yesterday



















Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

– Michael Curtis
yesterday





Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

– Michael Curtis
yesterday




1




1





I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

– Pam
yesterday







I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

– Pam
yesterday













6














Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 8





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    yesterday








  • 3





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    yesterday






  • 1





    @ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

    – Ian Goldby
    16 hours ago
















6














Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 8





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    yesterday








  • 3





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    yesterday






  • 1





    @ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

    – Ian Goldby
    16 hours ago














6












6








6







Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Carl WitthoftCarl Witthoft

9,45821432




9,45821432








  • 8





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    yesterday








  • 3





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    yesterday






  • 1





    @ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

    – Ian Goldby
    16 hours ago














  • 8





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    yesterday






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    yesterday








  • 3





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    yesterday






  • 1





    @ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

    – Ian Goldby
    16 hours ago








8




8





In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

– Ian Goldby
yesterday





In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

– Ian Goldby
yesterday




1




1





Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

– Michael Curtis
yesterday





Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

– Michael Curtis
yesterday




1




1





@MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

– supercat
yesterday







@MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

– supercat
yesterday






3




3





This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

– ContextSwitch
yesterday





This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

– ContextSwitch
yesterday




1




1





@ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

– Ian Goldby
16 hours ago





@ContextSwitch I think it would be a little misleading to put the second time signature in parentheses in the general case where the total bar duration changes from bar to bar. I definitely prefer Richard's answer for clarity.

– Ian Goldby
16 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82586%2fhow-to-notate-time-signature-switching-consistently-every-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Alcázar de San Juan

Griza ansero

Heinkel He 51